If you define yourself by the formal definition of a general intelligence then you're probably not going to go too far wrong.
That's what your theory ultimately entails. You are saying that you should go from specific labels ("I am a democrat") to more general labels (" I am a seeker of accurate world models") because it is easier to conform to a more general specification. The most general label would be a formal definition of what it means to think and act on an environment for the attainment of goals.
I don't think your theory is particularly useful.
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
What does it mean to be immortal? We haven't solved key questions of personal identity yet. What is it for one personal identity to persist?