Comment author: zero_0nee 04 June 2015 12:23:28PM 2 points [-]

Great post!

Comment author: zero_0nee 09 June 2014 08:27:36AM *  18 points [-]

I am a bit sceptical about whether or not it actually passed the Turing test. To me it looks more like a publicity stunts for the following reasons:

1) 5 minutes is a short period of time.

2) I don't believe Turing mentioned anything about 30% . I might be wrong on this one.

3) I don't know if the judges were properly trained. What questions did they ask? I feel like there must be plenty of questions related to IQ and creativity that a thirteen year old could answer with ease but that Eugene Goostman would struggle with. Examples: "Cow is to bull like, bitch is to ....?", or "Once upon a time there lived a pink unicorn in a big mushroom house with three invisible potatoes. Could you finish the story for me in a creative way and explain why the unicorn ended up painting the potatoes pink?" . The idea with the Turing test is that the computer should be indistinguishable from a human (in this case a 13 year old non native english speaker). I don't believe this criteria has been met until I see a chat transcript with reasonably hard questions.

4) Having the bot pose as a none native English speaking 13 year old might not be a violation of the rules, but I very much feel like it goes against the spirit of the Turing test. It reminds me a bit of this comic (http://existentialcomics.com/comic/15). But this is beside the point, I don't even think the bot would pass the Ukrainian-13-year-old-boy-turing-test if it was asked reasonably hard questions.

Until I learn more about the proceedings I remain utterly unconvinced that this is the milestone in AI media portrait it to be. It is nonetheless pretty cool!

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 19 September 2013 02:51:45AM 0 points [-]

You might want to get in touch with Leverage Research.

Leverage Research chooses projects based on two criteria:

Their ability to have a large positive impact on the world or

Their ability to empower the efforts of those who are working for a large positive impact.

Comment author: zero_0nee 19 September 2013 08:50:50AM 1 point [-]

Thanks. I am already in touch with them.

Comment author: intrepidadventurer 19 September 2013 07:11:47AM 0 points [-]

To what extent do you prefer the spreadsheet to have additional rows versus complete columns?

Comment author: zero_0nee 19 September 2013 08:49:10AM 0 points [-]

I prefer additional rows because it is harder to find great researchers than it is to find information about them, given that you know their name (one exception might be the "notable publications" column). The informational value of rows are hence greater.

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 18 September 2013 09:29:42PM 2 points [-]

Where do things like life extension fit in this?

Comment author: zero_0nee 19 September 2013 12:03:55AM *  1 point [-]

It does fit in. As long as you can convince yourself (and hopefully others) that it is of high consequentialist significance.

Comment author: lukeprog 18 September 2013 09:57:43PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: zero_0nee 19 September 2013 12:01:43AM 2 points [-]

Reformatted it in html now.

Comment author: zero_0nee 07 November 2012 06:36:52PM 20 points [-]

Done with the entire thing. :)

Comment author: zero_0nee 13 January 2012 08:30:25AM 3 points [-]

I suggest that you use this web app for the formatting. It is incomplete, but very intuitive to use and great for most purposes.