All of advancedatheist's Comments + Replies

I haven't done anything to "abuse" the voting system, and you should retract your accusation because you have no evidence of that. I don't understand how my posts can gain so many upvotes in such a short time.

7ChristianKl
Do you believe that those posts that receive massive downvotes are healthy for LW? Otherwise why do you continue posting them?
MrMind100

Well now I've both read the book and saw the movie, and I can tell you that's the complete opposite: Mars is portrayed as the perfect alien environment, strikingly beautiful yet extremely deadly, uncaring about its human inhabitants.
The struggle of Watney is exactly this, surviving with only your wits and a few scraps of human technology, but doing so without ever losing humor and optimism (this is the reason I personally love it).
Humanity, in The Martian, is yearned, a safe heaven to return to. Literary speaking, the point of catharsis is the return inside the human community.

5[anonymous]
I again call bullshit on your vote manipulation. I saw this post rise from -3 to +4 in the same reload cycle in which your other post in the open thread rose from -10 to +7.
-10VoiceOfRa

For the first time since Verne, real-life science has advanced so much that mundane sci-fi has gotten actually interesting. What's not to love about that?

3username2
In principle this could be a topic worth discussing, but we need way more cool-headed data analysis and way less political overtones, the way any good sex research is done. On some level, I sympathize with your need to vent. On another, you have to elevate your writing beyond relatively unfiltered venting.
[anonymous]250

You need to get off the internet and start interacting with normal people who don't advocate state-sanctioned massacres of any kind. You can find extreme enough opinions of any colour on the internet if you try hard enough. That doesn't mean any significant number of people hold them, it means there are billions of people online and someone went out of their way to find the most rhetorically useful targets.

MrMind150

Mixed-race parenting and absent or disengaged fathers seem to act as secondary causes in both Rodger's and Mercer's alienation

And you have evidence of this because...?

[anonymous]150

This post just went from -10 to 0 in about 3 minutes. I'm calling bullshit (again) on your trolling and vote-gaming.

EDIT: A further 7 upwards to +7 in another 5 minutes after I originally posted that. Seriously?

EDIT 2: A downvote? Really?

[anonymous]270

I've noticed that women freak out when I say that we need to restore a healthy patriarchy where women can't get sexual experience until marriage.

Not just women.

4knb
The context matters here. Were they talking about rounding up any virgin male? Or was it virgin men who make threats of violence against women specifically?

Do you feel motivated to channel your frustrations through a gun? If your answer is yes, you need to deal with bigger problems than your celibacy. If your answer is no, you are actually in the majority of the incel population, and you need to stop inventing causal connections where there are none.

2ike
"accidentally", and it was before the idea had even been thought of (and, in fact, before MWI had been proposed.
-2polymathwannabe
You picked the worst possible example. She was not the villain of that movie.
1[anonymous]
The fallacy of generalizing from fictional evidence? :)
2Richard_Kennaway
HITARQ? I can confabulate a rationalist!Dante version, but I can do that with anything:
8philh
Quite apart from the content of the quotes themselves, why are you posting so many in open threads instead of in quotes threads?
0raydora
How is a sexbot different from a sexdoll or a fleshlight and pornography? I don't think it would create any problems in a mentally healthy individual, though it might exacerbate those suffering from pre-existing issues surrounding sex.
8knb
Let's say a long-term couple wants to have a child, but some birth defect or sexual dysfunction prevents them from having sex. Should they be prevented from having a kid? The sex aspect doesn't seem to matter in itself. What would be concerning would be if people who fear intimacy or lack interpersonal skills are able to just skip straight to having babies out of loneliness, without ever having to get past their developmental blocks. I don't doubt adult virgins have missed out on important developmental experiences, but it's odd that you focus on sex itself as being this big developmental step rather than, e.g. a committed long-term relationship. I think that's the important part.
0passive_fist
Create a sex robot that behaves like a human female. Problem solved. In all seriousness though, it seems like by the time sex robots that look and act sufficiently human arrive on the scene, we'll already necessarily be well within the time frame of emergence of strong artificial intelligence and most of your points would become moot. It seems to me that there's only a short window of time between "sex robots that some men, but not most, would find appealing" and "the (sex?) robots have taken over."
[anonymous]110

Edit: wording.

  1. As a woman, I do find men who think that upon encountering one, they should 'deal with her' (not even sexually) rather creepy... Perhaps you could imagine this totally counterfactual world where you simply have no obligation to 'deal' with anyone based on a binary characteristic?

  2. As to virgin motherhood, strictly speaking only mating is 'missing', the rest is right there (since the blind god of evolution has prepared females to give healthy offspring if raped, pair-bonding and courtship cannot be necessary). Dunno how much emotional maturi

... (read more)

I think you're overestimating the importance of sex in human relationships. I'm willing to bet that someone with no sexual history can do a good enough job of raising a baby and a child, especially if they were well nurtured themselves. I'm concerned about how they'd do with an adolescent who's interested in sex.

More generally, I believe that people who have a hard time getting started on sexual/romantic relationships have parents who didn't have a good relationship.

As for social change, I don't think forbidding IVF for virgins isn't going to solve anythi... (read more)

3[anonymous]
Why are you worried about preserving skills that would largely become irrelevant?
-1Gunslinger
Sexbots are more of a joker, some sort of wild card in the gender dynamics debate. I think there's something that I'm not sure if it's being avoided or if it's simply elusive enough to not be mentioned, and I have no idea what that is. It seems like they're making men and women like cooperating enemies. On topic, sexbots would be harder to implement for women considering they're more attracted to behavior rather than looks.. although if you can make a convincing sexbot for a man I'm sure that canonically we're not too many steps away from making one for a woman. Next stop: Japan. Now I'll just need to figure out if their supposed dislike for non-natives is real or not. By the way advancedatheist, you give me a troll-esque vibe but admittingly you post some good content from time to time. High five.

I don’t know of anyone else who shares my point of view, and especially not professional sexologists.

You may need to update your beliefs based on that evidence. Admittedly, your personal history has a strong effect on your recommendations for society, but (and I'm sorry that there's no delicate way to say this) your case is not the average.

sexual relationships starting at an appropriate age

You keep using that term, like it's analogous to the essential time window in childhood for language acquisition, but adults are much more flexible.

male busines

... (read more)
7Dagon
I disagree (but upvoted - social evolution is a worthy topic). I'm a pretty big fan of freeing our (and specifically my) cognition from the evolutionary pressures which created it (and me). Removing the pressure of sex from almost all male/female interactions seems like a worthwhile thing to explore. I share your basic conservatism in that it's a pretty scary change. I just see the good in it as well as the risks.

Actually we have empirical evidence that women's premarital sexual adventures damage their ability to form stable marriages:

http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/08/defining-slut.html

When our allegedly unenlightened ancestors shamed sluts, shunned bastard kids and married their daughters off as young virgins, it turns out that they knew their business after all.

BTW, I find it curious that at least some of us consider paleonutrition a guide towards a modern healthy diet, but then turn around and call paleocognition bad names like "cognitive biases."

Lumifer100

we have empirical evidence

No, we have only some correlations where obvious third factors (e.g. IQ) are involved. If you want to take this approach, just being black strongly "damages ... ability to form stable marriages".

It seems that "correlation != causation" hasn't been repeated enough X-/

P.S. Not to mention that "stable marriages" doesn't look like a terminal goal to me. If that's all you want, just forbid divorce.

6gjm
"were doing something that, according to some evidence, has one positive consequence" is not the same as "knew their business".

Roosh has posted essays about the classical literature he has read and thought about, which shows an openness to a philosophical view of life. That can overlap with spiritual thinking to some extent.

5ChristianKl
Reading books is a quite different activity than seeking spirtual experience.

Brave New World, Chapter 17:

ART, SCIENCE–you seem to have paid a fairly high price for your happiness," said the Savage, when they were alone. "Anything else?"

"Well, religion, of course," replied the Controller. "There used to be something called God–before the Nine Years' War. But I was forgetting; you know all about God, I suppose."

"Well …" The Savage hesitated. He would have liked to say something about solitude, about night, about the mesa lying pale under the moon, about the precipice, the plunge into shado... (read more)

I have a casual interest in religious conversion as an empirical psychological phenomenon. The philosopher William James makes the case for studying religious experience empirically in one of his books published over a century ago - The Varieties of Religious Experience - so the idea has circulated for quite a while.

I think we might have an example of an internet figure undergoing an Augustinian sort of spiritual crisis documented online, namely the pickup artist Roosh Valizadeh. Roosh has posted and said lately that he doesn't enjoy his sexual conquests a... (read more)

1bogus
Yup, that's pretty normal. People tend to pursue casual flings out of a desire for sheer novelty, and plenty of them start pursuing longer-term goals after that desire is fulfilled. This is one reason why the widespread fear that casual sex might "ruin" folks and deprive them of any enjoyment of long-term relationships is almost certainly misguided.
3Lumifer
Are there any indications that Roosh is interested in religion or high-end spirituality? If anything, I'd expect him to go not Augustine, but Ecclesiastes.
4MrMind
I admit that I've tried to dig up why that site should matter on LW and came up empty handed. Like a gruesome car crash, from which you cannot avert your eyes, I've discovered these pearls: "Racism is a wonderful institution that should be rejuvenated and inculcated in schools." "Nothing is as damning to productivity as a visit from Rosie Palms and her five lovely sisters." "Women generally either lack, or fail to develop, that ability [to think abstractly], so they don't think about right and wrong in the way men do." (guess who said this)
2NancyLebovitz
While I agree with very little of it, I got at least one thing from listening to it-- a better understanding of the people who are revolted by claims of victimhood. There's a lot of "Women say they are victims, but men are the victimiest victims!". I would love to see more of "there are a lot of predatory people and social structures that make predation easier, but it doesn't shake out in simple ways by group." I'm going to have to look for that sort of thing somewhere else. It's possible that the meek will inherit the earth in the sense that those who are most susceptible to superstimuli and status-seeking will be bred out, and people who settle for moderately attractive mates, avoid all-consuming activities, and raise children will have a large reproductive advantage. It won't be the meekest of the meek, either-- they're the ones who give up because they aren't winning at the superstimuli games.
2Houshalter
Is it just my browser, or does this site not allow keyboard input? I can't scroll the page with arrow keys or pg up/down.

Oh, I forgot to add to the post below another source of my science-fictional view of sexual relationships: Robert Ettinger's nonfiction book Man Into Superman, which I read at the impressionable age of 14 in 1974. Scroll down to page 68, "Transsex and Supersex":

http://www.cryonics.org/images/uploads/misc/ManIntoSuperman.pdf

0VoiceOfRa
Seriously, if you want to get more sex, you are better off going to PUA/neomasculinity sites and following their advise than constantly whining about it. One thing girls find extremely unsexy is whining, especially whining about not being able to get sex.
2ChristianKl
What percentage of readers of Sci-Fi do you believe to never had sex?
8skeptical_lurker
I see that your being an incel bothers you greatly. If its any consolation, there are asexuals who think they are better off being asexual, because they don't have the heartbreak which comes with romantic relationships inevitably going wrong. Some people choose celibacy, and achieve great things because they have more free time. Many people say that masturbation feels almost as good, or even better, than sex, and sex is only better with a strong emotional connection, which as perviously mentioned, leads to heartbreak. Finally, if cryonics and transhumanism works out, then in our billion-year lifespans, sooner or later you are bound to get laid. So maybe things aren't that bad?
Dahlen470

... Do you ever talk about anything else other than your lack of sexual success? Alright, granted – I saw a few posts from you on cryonics. What would it take to steer you towards posting more of that and less of this? It's largely off-topic for LW, off-putting as well, and irrelevant to anyone who is not you. I get that it's something that concerns you deeply, but seriously, try getting advice on that one on a specialised forum.

4NancyLebovitz
Possibly of interest: Among Others-- a fantasy version of the author's life. Among other things, she was an sf fan during the 70s, and got some of her ideas about sex from science fiction.
bogus110

Well, science fiction itself is futuristic and sex is a popular topic. It's not clear that futuristic portrayals of sex in SF need to be explained, any more than futuristic portrayals of eating/food, travel, politics or society.

I don't understand how the karma system here works. One my posts below, about the usefulness of prostitutes for learning how to get into sexual relationships through dating regular women, dropped off for awhile with a -4 karma. Then I just checked, and it has a +4 karma. Where did the 8 karma points come from?

This has happened to some of my posts before. Do I have some fans I don't know about who just happen to show up in a short interval to upvote my controversial posts?

5Lumifer
I think you do -- what you do NOT have is a good model for predicting future karma scoring of your posts :-/
8philh
I think someone is using a bunch of alts to occasionally mega-upvote posts they like.
2MrMind
Welcome to everybody's on this forum world.

From the Foreword to Brave New World:

Nor does the sexual promiscuity of Brave New World seem so very distant. There are already certain American cities in which the number of divorces is equal to the number of marriages. In a few years, no doubt, marriage licenses will be sold like dog licenses, good for a period of twelve months, with no law against changing dogs or keeping more than one animal at a time. As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends compensatingly to increase. And the dictator (unless he needs cannon fodder and fam

... (read more)
2polymathwannabe
I'm tempted to create a drinking game for every time the Enlightenment gets blamed for whatever somebody thinks is wrong with the world.
4Good_Burning_Plastic
Why all those capital letters?

If I had sexual learning experiences only from prostitutes, and I had nothing else to go on, should I have asked this woman how much money she wanted to come with me to my room in Laughlin's hotel for sex

That would likely be perceived as highly inappropriate and carries with it the chance of you getting banned from that convention in the future.

3Good_Burning_Plastic
Epistemic status: speculation It doesn't (unless you're subconsciously self-sabotaging because you're scared that you will make a bad impression with your first sexual performance or something). OTOH, it doesn't hurt either (except via opportunity costs, but then so does anything else). So how does eating at restaurants translate over to learning how to cook? It doesn't, but that's not what people eat at restaurants for.
9polymathwannabe
That generally doesn't work on women who don't already sell sex for a living. Maybe a sex surrogate could be useful for you. She would provide you with more emotional and social guidance than a regular hooker, and the learning process would advance at your own pace and on your own terms.
1MrMind
It doesn't, in no way. The top positive effect you could get from sex workers is the relief of pressure and anxiety, but if you're not getting even that then I guess you could stop wasting your money. 99.9% it would have had a bad outcome. Why didn't you just simply invited her to discuss the things further in front of a drink in a more intimate space?
2Tem42
I don't believe that I have seen any statement that incels are freaks stronger than your own statement that "otherwise she might assume that I had gone to prison for 30 years". I'm sure that there are some people who might assume that -- or worse -- but I would not expect that most people would. Likewise, when someone overshares about their problems (and if you defined yourself as an 'involuntary celebrate', you are framing it as a problem), the default social response is "don't give up, you can handle it!" whether you're talking about dandruff or cancer. Her response may not be what you hoped for, but it wasn't a clear indicator of prejudice.
philh120

So how should I answer questions about my sexual history in a medical context?

"No."

Or if there are looking to be a lot of questions, you can head them off with "no, I'm a virgin".

Viliam160

Men without families have always been considered expendable. The whole concept of army is built around that. I'm not saying it's right; I'm just saying it's old as history.

The new thing is that "having sex" has been completely divorced from "having a family", so now some stigma (less) is associated with not having a family, and some stigma (more) is associated with not having sex. It makes sense this way, because being unable to attract someone implies being unable to start a family. Again, I'm describing here, not making a moral judgem... (read more)

Even more so, because the male nurse might assume I'm gay otherwise.

I've noticed some little-studied cognitive biases here, because sexually experienced people tend to force ready-made "explanations" on male incels that make them comfortable, instead of trying to study and understand incel as its own phenomenon. The canned explanations lead to bad conclusions and useless advice for men like me. How would seeing a prostitute teach me how to get into sexual relationships? Men who get their sexual experience exclusively from prostitutes can remain ... (read more)

Otherwise she might assume that I had gone to prison for 30 years or something ridiculous like that

the male nurse might assume I'm gay otherwise

What you need from the nurse is her set of skills. Her personal opinion of you is irrelevant to doing her job. I understand that we may see health professionals as higher-status than us, but they're actually doing us a service. You don't need to feel intimidated by an unspoken imagined condemnation.

3NancyLebovitz
It's reasonable to assume that any bias which is common in the culture will also show up in how patients are treated.
drethelin300

Don't rant to strangers about how incel you are. If you do, don't be surprised if some of those strangers try to offer you comfort.

6polymathwannabe
I'm curious. If you had been examined by a male nurse, would you have felt the same need to give an extended explanation?
Alicorn200

I doubt very much that your context was medically relevant. She behaved inappropriately and of course you should change providers if you can and prefer to, but there was no reason to do anything but answer "no" to her questions in the first place, especially if the alternative involved phrases like "close the deal".

I don't know of any Bronies with cryonics arrangements.

4Fluttershy
The LW group on Fimfiction is pretty big, and I recognize a couple people with cryonics arrangements from that list. I'm leaning towards signing up for neuro with Alcor myself.

Yet som there be that by due steps aspire

To lay their just hands on that Golden Key

That ope's the Palace of Eternity.

(John Milton, Comus, lines 12-14)

May Kim find that Golden Key some day.

The article discusses the Brain Preservation Foundation. The BPF has responded here:

A COURAGEOUS STORY OF BRAIN PRESERVATION, “DYING YOUNG” BY AMY HARMON, THE NEW YORK TIMES.

http://www.brainpreservation.org/a-courageous-story-of-brain-preservation-dying-young-by-amy-harmon-the-new-york-times/

Probably the biggest cryonics story of the year. In the print edition of The New York Times, it appeared on the front page, above the fold.

A Dying Young Woman's Hope in Cryonics and a Future, by Amy Harmon

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/us/cancer-immortality-cryogenics.html

You can also watch a short documentary about Miss Suozzi here:

http://www.nytimes.com/video/science/100000003897597/kim-suozzis-last-wishes.html

9advancedatheist
Yet som there be that by due steps aspire To lay their just hands on that Golden Key That ope's the Palace of Eternity. (John Milton, Comus, lines 12-14) May Kim find that Golden Key some day.
7James_Miller
I wonder if the article will increase Alcor's membership? As "Why have so few people signed up for cryonics" is a big mystery for cryonics supporters such as myself we should use the opportunity of the article to make predictions about the article's impact. I predict that the article will boost Alcor's membership over the next year by 10% above trend which basically means membership will be 10% higher a year from now than it is currently. EDIT: I predict Alcor's membership will be 11% higher a year from now than it is today. Sorry for the poorly written comment above.
5Fluttershy
I'm impressed at how positively the author portrayed cryonicists. The parts which described the mishaps which occurred during/before the freezing process were especially moving.

A friend of mine attributes the refugee crisis in the Levantine countries to a severe drought caused by "climate change."

Does "climate change" mysteriously stop at Israel's borders? I haven't heard of any political breakdown or mass emigration from that country.

5drethelin
Israel is far more stable politically and far more wealthy than many of its neighbors. As far as climate change goes, the geological record shows that global warming would be expected to cause the opposite of a drought, as the hottest times for hundreds of thousands of years coincide with greater rainfall and plant growth.
7knb
The civil war in Syria emerged from the "Arab Spring," and supposedly the drought conditions (possibly a result of climate change) were a major factor causing dissatisfaction with the governments in effected countries. But clearly the "refugee crisis" is not a result of drought, it's a result of European countries being unwilling to enforce their borders and immigration laws. Israel is not experiencing the refugee crisis Europe is because they don't let the refugees in and consistently enforce their restrictive immigration laws.
4hodmt150

I do not know if emigration can be attributed to climate change or not, but I do that that Israel produces very large quanties of fresh water by desalination:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desalination#Israel

Neighboring countries may not be able to afford this.

The cemeteries of the world show where the hard boundary of objective truth lies.

4entirelyuseless
I'm not sure what this is meant to prove. Ike didn't say here that the professor claimed that postmodernism is true.
5cousin_it
I suppose from a certain point of view all technology is a conspiracy to turn men into boys, and I'm not sure if that's a bad thing :-)

Not sure about the sexbots, but I predict that in my lifetime (ie maybe another 40 years) knowing how to drive will become about as relevant for most people as knowing how to ride a horse.

I do think it's still a bit too soon to be thinking about buying a driverless car though.

1moridinamael
The fallacy is in the use of the word "evolved." If you take a random sampling of ten thousand modern humans and scatter them across an undeveloped planet, what will happen is basically: * The ones who live in horrific environments will barely manage to survive and fail to develop technologically. * The ones who live in environments with plentiful game and foraging availability but with minimal agricultural potential will not perceive any pressure to drive innovation. * The ones who live in environments most conducive to agriculture, with a harsh enough climate that saving food for the winter is a good idea, will eventually develop agriculture. The selection pressures on technological development work orders of magnitude faster than the selection pressures on intelligence.
2[anonymous]
It definitely gives some credence to either biological or cultural arguments for innovation.

Well this certainly lives up to the discussion thread title. This is an ill posed question because it selectively carves out a very specific definition of human value for obviously ideological reasons. Why is capital the definitive measure of contributions to the human race? What about the wheel (Mesopotamians), what about fire (Africans - geographically, probably no one knows the taxonomy but certainly not northern Eurasians). What about geometry? Or perhaps something fairly important called numbers. Are those not knowledge?

1[anonymous]
That this is not a good measure of that?
3The_Jaded_One
be careful: there's a decent amount of variance in how people respond to things. Maybe some people are "damaged" by having a lot of non-procreative sexual encounters. Maybe this applies particularly to women. But I highly doubt that it's a uniform effect. Do you seriously think there'll be a big gender difference? BTW I am definitely not particularly politically correct with respect to gender politics and I've read the blogs you mention, but as a rationalist I am not sure you're on sound footing here. Yes, men and women are different (on average!) psychologically. But if women didn't physically age and men didn't physically age why would the average woman deal with immortality by committing suicide more quickly than the average man? Is there any contemporary analogue of a woman having a family and suddenly being biologically 18 again that we can generalize from? I suspect you could look at women from affluent backgrounds who got pregnant at a young age and see what they did in, e.g. their late 30s. Sill, that's considered "old" by society, and there is a decent amount of sexism and sexist taboo which kind of shoehorns such people in some ways, though this is decreasing. On the other side men in their 40s and 50s definitely seem to want to be 20 again. We call it a mid-life crisis! Basically I think you are extrapolating into fairly unknown territory, and what I do think we can extrapolate seems to point to just a lot of variability based on personality, life-philosophy, etc. Though I suppose the fact that "mid life crisis/buying a sports car and a leather jacket" is associated with men does count as evidence in favour of your hypothesis.

Eventually I guess you could just wirehead everyone to experience perfect blissful ecstasy for all eternity.

Or else Immortal Supermen(TM) would have progressed so far that they will enjoy wireheading as an occasional treat, like drinking a glass of some highly regarded wine with dinner.

-1Brillyant
No. The proper wireheading would max out your utility all the time forever. This would be the one scenario I think the anti-deathists can use to prove death is bad. If everything was perfect for everyone all the time forever, then immortality seems okay.
1Viliam
Even loving women sometimes have imperfections, such as being jealous of other loving women, or angry when I decide to ignore them and play computer games instead. Sexbots, in theory, could be perfect. Also, even if someone has their "organic experience", they may still wish the sexbots for the others.
PhilGoetz160

Yeah, if you want to turn more and more adolescent boys into adult male virgins who lack the skills they need for living in a society full of self-directed women.

I do!

It's good for men who don't want love, but just want sex.

It's good for women, because it filters out the men who don't want love, but just want sex.

It's good for me, because it reduces the competition!

Most people do not have open-ended interests the way LWers do.

Marvin Minsky said something similar a few years ago, to the effect that most people don't have "real goals," unlike the scientists Minsky knows who tell him that they have personal lists of problems that they would like to solve, but the problems will take longer than their current life expectancies.

Mike Darwin also mentioned this as a problem in an essay he published in Cryonics magazine back in 1984:

http://www.alcor.org/cryonics/cryonics8402.txt

Darwin thinks that the arrival of ... (read more)

5tim
Not really buying the analogy between massive wealth and superlongevity. Virtually unlimited access to super-stimulation such as fame, drugs and any other rush you could want to get your hands on doesn't seem all that comparable to an unlimited supply of everyday normal life. The everyday reality of living forever isn't going to be shockingly more exciting than regular ol' not living forever. There will be new awesome and crazy stuff, but you'll have had lifetimes to grow used to them. People born into them will think of them like how we currently think of small handheld computers that can connect us to almost everyone we've ever known and effortlessly tap into a huge reservoir of collected human knowledge. Seems more analogous to looking at the average level of wealth/lifespan in 1700 and wondering how our brains could ever handle the lavish living conditions and doubled life expectancy of 2015.
-2[anonymous]
They don't, at least not simply by virtue of being men.
2Username
I often hear claims like that here on LW, but they sound very implausible to me. I never had a girlfriend until I was 26 but I'm not under the impression that before then I was deficient in otherwise dealing with female friends/professors/etc. in a way that I no longer am, or in a way that I was not with male friends/professors/etc. (In particular, in most of my late teens and early twenties I had many more female friends than male friends.) Do you (or anybody else who's been making such claims) have any evidence (that could be easily shared on a Web forum) of that?
6Viliam
I could easily argue the opposite way: Once perfect sex becomes something you can easily buy in a form of sex robots, and the practice becomes so widespread that it will be socially accepted by the mainstream... maybe the partner relationships will become better, because people would use them to optimize for other values -- such as being nice to each other, being a good conversational partner, etc. And those people who can't provide any other value, they will stay at home with their sexbots, and won't pass their genes to another generation. Genetic pool improved and overpopulation solved using this one simple trick! (I am not suggesting this as a serious prediction, just as an example that you can easily verbally argue towards almost any bottom line.) I use ad-blocking software, so the most obvious hypothesis is a bit difficult to verify, but the prior probability is so high I would still bet on it.
7Richard_Kennaway
That is the key to Zoltan Istvan.
2ChristianKl
What kind of question is this? There a lot of rubbish posted on the internet. Despite the stuff about sex bots, writing like: "In 15 to 20 years time, cranial implant technology will enable humans to overcome many of their idiosyncrasies and bad behaviors—making a new generation of very wholesome and exemplary children. In fact, going to college may be replaced by downloading higher educations into our brains." doesn't look like a serious analysis. Learning is an active process. It's a process of engaging in critical thinking. It's not simply replaced by a download into the brain.
5Dagon
I think you're mistaken about how important sex is to relationships, This varies pretty wildly by individual, but I find it easy to believe that a good portion of the populace would be better off if there were many uncomplicated orgasm sources, rather than requiring a deep committed exclusivity. That bundled commitment is valuable, and I'm quite happy in it. And, over time, as technology improves and my wife and I age and change, I can easily believe we'll add robots to our marriage. We have some now, but they're mostly there for mechanical assistance, and we don't have much of a deep bond with them.

Korzybski fits into a larger intellectual pattern since the Enlightenment, where smart people think that human affairs have gotten disordered somehow.The intellectual reformer believes he can diagnose the problem, find a solution by arguing from plausible first principles, and then get humanity back on a normative path. Just think of Robert Owen, Karl Marx, Ayn Rand, L. Ron Hubbard, Buckminster Fuller, Timothy Leary, etc.

Basically these intellectuals think teleologically, and they assume that humans should have instruction manuals that intellectuals can de... (read more)

1ChristianKl
Where do you think L. Ron Hubbard, Buckminster Fuller and Timothy Leary have made points that they disagree with Korzybski on fundamental matters?
0Viliam
My feeling is that these people are right about some things where the society is wrong, but also wrong plus horribly overconfident about other things. Maybe it is a curse of being significantly more intelligent than most people around you. Nine times of ten, people around do something obviously stupid. Once, it is you who is stupid about things that most people get approximately right, but you cannot distinguish it from the former case -- also you are already stuck in the belief that the other people are always wrong (especially if they don't have enough verbal skills or academic credentials). Also, underestimating domain-specific knowledge, and thinking that general intelligence can solve everything even without the relevant data. Not necessarily arguing literally from the "first principles", but rather having very little and very unrepresentative data (an equivalent of seeing a few youtube videos on the topic today), and believing that this is enough as long as you use a lot of brainpower to extrapolate from these data.

You mention the Enlightenment, (although it's a strange Enlightenment that includes both Marx and Rand), so I guess that you are intending a contrast with neoreaction. But your template fits NRx just as well: things have gotten disordered somehow, the intellectual reformer believes etc. They disagree on why things have gotten disordered and on what the cure is.

For NRxers, it is because we have fallen away from the wisdom of the past when Men knew better. The cure is to re-establish the wisdom of the past, for Man Now to live as Man did Then.

For Korzybski,... (read more)

Gregory Benford, Ph.D., the physicist and science fiction writer, talks about cryonics in a new video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoGMYjYSCG8

Obviously related: D.J. MacLennan's new book, Frozen to Life:

https://www.singularityweblog.com/cryonics-a-glass-state-time-travel/

Cryonics: A Glass-state Time Travel

by D.J. MacLennan on August 6, 2015 0 Comments

Frozen to Life

What if we gave people a way to escape absolute death at the end of their biologically-allotted lifespans? Wouldn’t many of them jump at it? Of course, and they do, and have been for some time now. Religionists believe that the metaverse (or whatever they wish to call the whole macro-everything, including all the ‘spiritual’ bits) ... (read more)

The social ones. I actually probably value this higher than 1. Explaining to my loved ones my decision, having to endure mockery and possibly quite strong reactions

You have to play a Long Game here, something I find increasingly easy to do as I have reached my 50's. I told my original "loved ones" - my mother, my father (divorced from the former), and my sister - about cryonics a quarter century ago. They all considered it weird, but then whatever problems that might have caused me tend to correct themselves with time. My father died last Octo... (read more)

If everyone outside of cryonics thinks of it as a rich man's indulgence, then why haven't adventuresses showed up? In the real world, cryonics acts like "female Kryptonite."

Eh, smart people can rationalize doing dumb things - Skepticism 101.

I would point to cryobiologist Greg Fahy, Ph.D., as a more relevant authority:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Fahy

The cryonics movement needs more people with clinical medical backgrounds involved, but then it also needs people with practical business experience.

I will give you a business intelligence test. Look at just the home page of the website for this startup cryonics organization in Oregon, and tell me one obvious thing that it lacks - just on the home page:

http://oregoncryo.com/

-2[anonymous]
Scientific evidence for its treatment being noticeably different from having died.
3jordansparks
I wrote it, so I find the question and MattG's answer interesting. I will try to figure out what you think is lacking, but it's probably just a difference of opinion on the purpose of the website. Just so we're clear, the purpose is NOT to get customers to buy our service. We are still in the startup phase. Maybe you think it's the phone number that's lacking. That's very intentional. We don't want people calling us right now.
2Paul Crowley
It doesn't say what the hell they actually do.
0Artaxerxes
Where's the answer?
0[anonymous]
It lacks a whole bunch of things, like a CTA, USP, any sort of trust indicators... I could go on here, but this is really quite a hard test to choose just one :).
-9Lumifer

The lottery model doesn't apply to cryonics because the individual cryonicist's choices in the here and now bear on the probability of success. Cryonicist Thomas Donaldson, Ph.D. in mathematics, wrote about this back in the 1980's.

http://www.alcor.org/Library/html/probability.html

Personality certainly plays a role in the early-peaking badass. But then an introverted person thrown into a lot of sticky situations that he has to figure out and survive through could wind up with a pretty impressive résumé, and in effect become a different kind of badass.

Focus on the goal more than the means:

I want to stay alive in good shape.

Life allows for experiences.

Experiences can lead to skills.

Accumulate enough skills, and you can become a futuristic badass like something out of science fiction, kind of like the character Rutger Hauer plays in Blade Runner, but really old and "ultramature," as Max More says, if you do it right: "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. . . "

And then, some day, young people - I don't mean ones in their teens and twenties, but ones only a few centuries old af... (read more)

0Lumifer
Being a badass is not a function of how many skills have you accumulated.

I don’t want to wake up a stranger in a strange world.

That already happens to everyone. We call it "birth."

If revived, I wouldn’t have any useful skills.

People make a living now with allegedly primitive skills. I live in rural Arizona, and I know guys who work as cowboys and ranch hands. One of them told me the other day that he had to round up and brand some steers.

The people who revive me might torture me.

Or try to rape you, like in the "reverse cryonics" time travel story Outlander. Claire seems to manage regardless.

It

... (read more)
2gjm
Small children are better at adjusting themselves to radically new things than adults. (Though it's possible that, conditional on cryonics working well at all, whatever technology allows the raising of the kinda-dead would also allow you to increase your neuroplasticity without wrecking your brain.)
Load More