All of CraigMichael's Comments + Replies

We've done some things to combat that,

Are this visible at the typical user level? 

Of course you can, you just have to make the first set of wolves very small. 

Imagine fiancéespace (or fiancéspace) - as in the space of romantic partners that would marry you (assuming you're not married and you want to be). You can imagine "drawing" from that space, but once you draw nearly all of the work is still ahead of you. Someone that was initially "friendly" wouldn't necessarily stay that way, and someone that was unfriendly wouldn't necessarily stay that way. It's like asking "how do you make sure a human mind stays friendly to you forever?" We can't solve that with our lowly ape minds, and I'm not sure that we'd want to.... (read more)

1Tapatakt
You can't selectively breed labradors if the first wolf kills you and everyone else.

IMO, I think the rationality project/LW is handling these crises far better than EA is doing.

I'm not really sure if they're separable at this point? There's so much overlap and cross-posting, it seems like they have the same blood supply.

Huh... thought I would get disagreement, but not for that reason. Thanks for the feedback. I was trying not to use terms that would appear in searches like FTX, Nick Bostrom or Max Tegmark. I did link to relevant posts where I thought it would be unclear.

Was trying not to specifically mention FTX, Nick Bostrom or Max Tegmark. I wanted to keep the audience to people who were familiar with it and not people Googling the topics who were off-forum and not EA or rationalist types. 

I tried to make that clear in the introduction. 

It was intended to be tonge-in-cheek, but okay, point taken. 

4Aiyen
This is blatantly wrong.  Restricting the lives of other people just to gain a little more cachet for you and your fellow urbanites.  Clear defection, clear evil. 
4jaspax
"I want gas stoves to be restricted so that gross people who live in suburbs can't have them." This might be the single worst take I've ever seen on LW. I'm sorry I can't be more constructive here, but this is the kind of garbage comment I expect from the dregs of Twitter, not this site.

Am with you very much here. Recently decided that I need to start doing this more often. Negative karma isn't really negative karma if you've learned something from the experience.

"Successful" is an odd concept with it comes to social media. Most people would call Twitter, Facebook, TikTok, etc, successful. I think that's like saying oxycontin is successful, or McDonalds is successful, or Doritos is successful.  It depends on the point of view you're looking at it from.

There's an argument to be made that it's better to influence a small number of people profoundly, then influence a large number of people negligibly (as you might do on larger networks, where any influence you might have will be almost entirely washed away by whatever is more viral). In fact, that's why I'm on LessWrong, the scale is more apt.

I considered self-hosting, but an email server is already more complex than I want to manage and a Mastodon server is much more so.

I have no affiliation here, but there's lots of places like masto.host where you can pay to host your own instance. Sure, someone running your VM might do something awful. But... that's cloud hosting. 

I will vouch for the admin of linuxrocks.online, been on their for years (and other than some unfortunate downtime), it's been solid (in the drama-free sense). 

I’m wondering why not just call for mutual disarmament under IAEA supervision? There’s an old, but now very relevant episode of 80000 hours with Daniel Ellsberg;

https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/daniel-ellsberg-doomsday-machines/

I didn’t keep the time stamps, but he gets in to the approximate number of warheads a state should need as a deterrent, and says it's probably not more than 100.

Luisa Rodriguez has an excellent post on the EA forum with fairly current estimates of the downstream effects of a nuclear exchange between US and Russia with the 201... (read more)

Posted three examples that I thought to screencap when they occurred, but if I tracked everything there would be hundreds. https://twitter.com/craigtalbert/status/1586952770170388481?s=20&t=8BtJYArZ9wtMJrJQK2IR4g

I can't say for certain, but my hunch is that you're dead on here.

You were ahead of the curve here.

Yeah... if this happens everyone will have to make their own choices. I may or may not regret mine. Sometimes I feel like the old man here. Like I'm not sure if you were around the Internet when it was a little more wild west. Sites with content like this (CW: euthanasia) were more common. I don't want to be macabre or maudlin or put ideas in anyone's head, but I thought about keeping some of the proven materials to implement that at my disposal given current events... But with the acceleration of things recently, it's like there's a pep in my step that I ... (read more)

3Adam Zerner
Haha np :) That makes sense about euthanasia. I think most people would agree actually that there is a point where life isn't worth living anymore. I think that and I can't really think of too many people who are more anti-death than me.

You booby trap your house? What if some kids stumble in or something 50 years from now?

3nim
Did I say that? I personally don't leave traps set, because realistically the person most likely to get hurt by them is myself, but plenty of people like me don't subscribe to that line of reasoning. Anyways, the point I was trying to make was in the next level of abstraction up from the question of whether any particular house is trapped at any particular time -- it's the uncertainty of not knowing whether a given house is really safe to enter.

Luisa says Rodriguez says a US-Russia exchange is 5.1 to 58 Tg of schmutz in the atmosphere. Her best guess is 31 Tg.  A NATO-Russia exchange would be larger. Important figures below. 31 Tg puts us on the edge of "nuclear autumn." Full scale NATO-Russia is probably nuclear winter.

 

But even if I did survive, that Hatchet-style life doesn't sound very good.

Maybe. Maybe it will be the first time you really feel alive and some of the most exhilarating moments of your life. It's better to wear out than to rust out, as our grandparents used to say. 

In general humans suck at affective forecasting, so don't discount this so quickly.

I, for one, want to see what happens. Even if it sucks. Even if it's horrible. Even if most of the people I know and love are dead. I believe in humanity, and maybe I don't make 1/2 copies of my genes but my species survives.

2Adam Zerner
Yeah that's an interesting thought. I like to think of myself as an adaptable person who can derive happiness from a wide variety of circumstances. But a Hatchet-style life is pretty extreme. My model of myself says it's a good amount beyond my ability to adapt to circumstances and derive happiness. And as a reference class, thinking about what I recall from positive psychology studies, people tend to not be very happy when their basic needs aren't met, and I think that points towards it being a thing the average person isn't very good at.

These are interesting thoughts.

I know this is CNN, but the source (Robert Baer) seems solid. https://youtu.be/7ZgBSYZb-gk

He says putin used information from Russian spy in the CIA to blackmail Yeltsin.

If we discovered any of them currently active, I wonder if we could deliberately feed them bits of misinformation to steer Putin one way or another?

Or maybe if the undiscovered spies could become something like ironic double agents on their own if the spies are against escalation? On their own imitative they steer things towards de-escalation? Or maybe defect at the last moment to try and stop escalation?

Have you “mentally wargamed” the CIA/MI6 option? Who would replace him? Would they be better or worse? How would Russian citizens respond? Is there anything like an automated event that is suppressed daily by Putin while he is alive but that would be triggered if he dies?

Since you seem to have thought a lot of this through:

Do you have thoughts on the possibility of pre-existing weapons caches in the US or Europe that could be activated remotely by Russia? (Nuclear, chemical, biological, etc)?

Similarly, it seems that every few years we discover Russians sp... (read more)

2arunto
Another thing that could be interesting with spies is what they can do before a US/NATO-Russian war. If the Russian had one or more top level spies in the US security establishment or in NATO (as they, or their East German satellite, had during the cold war), then it could increase or decrease the risk of  Russia using nuclear weapons.  If Russia got signals from inside US/NATO that the West was really willing to retaliate militarily in the case of a Russian nuclear strike on Ukraine, then this information could decrease Russia's willingness to escalate. If, however, Russia got signals from inside US/NATO that the West was not willing to use military force as an answer to a Russian nuclear strike on Ukraine, then this information could increase Russia's will to escalate.

Marginally Compelling had a great podcast episode with Josh Centers back in March of this year on surviving a nuclear attack. https://polimath.substack.com/p/get-ready-for-nuclear-war-with-josh#details

I haven’t seen it mentioned, so I’m mentioning it.

Even with massive air strikes? Couldn’t they just carpet bomb any Ukrainian military position?

1Teerth Aloke
Honest opinion
2Sausage Vector Machine
If you mean the massive strikes on civilian infrastructure, then no, even the complete destruction of said Ukrainian infrastructure will not significantly improve Russia's chances in this war. This only creates hardship for the civilian population and increases the overall cost of aid to Ukraine for Western countries. The Russian army has proven time and time again that it is incapable of attacking. Even in June, when the Russian army greatly outnumbered the Ukrainian army in artillery, and Ukraine was losing 300–500 soldiers a day, Russian troops advanced slowly and with huge losses. One of the reasons is their complete inability to coordinate between artillery and infantry. The correct approach is to hit enemy defenses with artillery and attack immediately after the hit. They managed to repeatedly fail even this simple coordination exercise. Recently, the Russian army even proved that it was not capable of organizing an effective defense. Yes, the mobilization will probably help with defense (with huge casualties), but it will hardly help with attack. Even if only the military remain in Ukraine and the entire civilian population is killed or flees the destroyed cities, the Russian army will not be able to win. I wouldn't say that Ukraine has "irreversible momentum", although it has an effective army that functions as it should. But it looks more like a complete lack of ability to achieve any momentum on the Russian side.

Had this same thought. Seems worthy of discussion.

Interesting blog post that some of Russia’s most recent nuclear tech may not work well and may be motivated more to bargain with than to use.

https://www.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/1208662/hypersonic-glide-vehicles-what-are-they-good-for/

EDIT: Similar points made here: https://www.sandboxx.us/blog/russias-massively-powerful-nukes-are-strategic-duds/

both posts are prior to Ukraine invasion.

I think it would be a mistake to believe that everything in Russia’s nuclear arsenal is 100% working order.

Sounds there’... (read more)

I suppose this is a reason to keep my AMC+ subscription. Better Call Saul was pretty good, but I didn’t use it for anything else.

EDIT: Removed "nuclear arsenal not working because Russia didn't bother to maintain them" as I don't find that especially likely on reflection.

 

What reflection changed your probability here? The probability here seems non-zero to me, and maybe likely. 
 

EDIT: not sure what the down votes are about. Curious as to what made you change your mind.

2Algon
That wasn't something I've put actual thought into, or was something that came from an expert I trusted. Maybe it is true, but I'd need to think more about it before I was OK with claiming it was so. And I just didn't feel like doing that.
4Sausage Vector Machine
Good point, thanks. I've edited my comment.

There's potential paths that this model doesn't include. I have to believe that the Five Eyes have done some amount of work to find ways to hamstring Russias nuclear capabilities (I recall stories that "we" were able to sabotage chips in in the supply chain for Iraq's missiles, for example).  Meaning, there's a chance Russia does some kind of nuclear launch and it's horribly botched for one reason or another.  Their own incompetence, supply chain sabotage, etc. They may, then, be reluctant to launch another.

I don't know what a reasonable prior is... (read more)

2arunto
From the current numbers (-3 and -4) your post does not seem to be heavily downvoted. I believe there may be some users here who see any arguments for a smaller threat as dangerous. As long as there are not many upvotes, even a very small number of users with this attitude could lead to those numbers. We have seen a similar dynamic with the public health authorities during the Covid crisis (prioritizing message control over epistemic rationality).

I may have RSVP'd yes here but forgot this was Yom Kippur. Sorry guys, family plans tonight. 

There can be no clearer proof of the abuse of an emergency than extending it after publicly declaring that it is over.

 

I disagree. The pandemic is over in the sense that we've learned to live with the virus.  The pandemic is not over in the sense that the social and economic consequences are still with us. So there's a sense in which I can get it.

I know this is old—do you have your research here on lifting and testosterone?

Made it really hard for me to poop normally.

It’s also given via IV, which means bioavailability via digestion wouldn’t apply.

1CallumMcDougall
Thanks Nihalm, also I wasn't aware of it being free! CraigMichael maybe you didn't find it cause it's under "Rationality: From AI to Zombies" not "Sequences"? The narration is pretty good imo, although one disadvantage is it's a pain to navigate to specific posts cause they aren't titled (it's the whole thing, not the highlights).
7Nihalm
Here's the link -   https://www.audible.com/pd/Rationality-From-AI-to-Zombies-Podcast/B08K54VPJJ P.S  - Since it's released as a podcast, you can find it for free on any podcast player. No need to use audible  https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/rationality-from-ai-to-zombies-eliezer-KU_H6tqjvD5/
Answer by CraigMichael55

Personally, I’d prefer no alignment posts unless they’re useful summaries, or “here’s how to get up to speed on AI alignment.” With the alignment content, even with a comp sci background, it’s like I’m jumping in to The Chronicles of Amber 3/4ths of the way in to the book. I just don’t know what’s going on.

Won’t make it up from Denver. Sorry man, but love that area of the state.

That's a nice back patio.

1Nick
As long as he is fine around other people, it should not be a problem. Hope you can come.

Okay, yeah, that's a really good point. I'm going to go for 100% compliance with whatever advice I get. I'll put it on my calendar and set a reminder and I'll make sure they know I'm doing this.

Going to look for another TMJ specialist, and based the other comments here likely an osteopath and orthopedist.

2DirectedEvolution
Good luck!
1ambigram
No problem:) Hope it helps & all the best!

Thanks for this! I'll ask my PCP the next time I see him (hopefully soon here). 

I switched jobs recently, and it is stressful. So there's that. But with the kind of pain and stuff it feels like it has to be more than just stress, although stress could for sure have been a distal cause.

Do you feel unusually fatigued / sleep deprived? Frequent headaches? mental fog? worse at concentrating lately? short temper?

 

I've had sleep issues since a traumatic event around 2012. Short temper, yes, but mostly because I'm worried about this and it's kind of exhausting. Not many headaches to speak of. Concentrating has been an issue, but I think that's because my body feels weird and it's distracting. 

It could be, though. I'll discuss it with my PCP next time I see him. It's mostly a diagnosis of exclusion, yeah?

1Vitor
Yes, it's mostly a diagnosis of exclusion. But Bayesian evidence starts piling up much sooner than a doctor is willing to write down a diagnosis on an Official Piece of Paper. However, there are some tell-tale signs like the myofascial trigger points mentioned by others, heightened pain when touching specific bones (e.g. the vertebrae), and other specific patterns how the body reacts to stimulus. This is the domain of rheumatologists. Are your sleep issues stress-related? Like jumpiness, unable to settle into the relaxation of falling asleep? What I'm getting at here is that there are two broad classes of sleep issues. In one, you have trouble falling asleep, in the other, your sleep is not restful because you're too tense, in a way that persists through the process of falling asleep. The latter is really really bad, as it leads to chronic sleep deprivation because your body isn't getting good rest, even though you "put in the hours". The thing with psychosomatic symptoms is also that there's a feedback loop between the pain (or weird sensations), and your mental state. As you get habituated to focusing more and more on those sensations, your brain learns to bring them up to your conscious attention more eagerly. This results in pain sensitization. Even in a situation where let's say the pain has a clear physical cause that has been corrected, the pain can persist. The original injury was just the trigger of the problem. It might be that your collection of symptoms is actually pain that may be mild / weird enough that you don't recognize it as such. An easy way to test this is to take a standard dose of an over-the-counter painkiller and checking if you feel any different an hour later. PS: feel free to send me a message anytime if you want to talk in more depth.

With only Google-knowledge of jaw anatomy, I don't think it's a lymph node, but I could be wrong. Feeling it now (it's better than when I posted originally, but is still fairly sore) it's feels like it's right on the masseter muscle. 

Looking at the image, it's not near the lymph nodes identified. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/325947#what-are-they

Feels like it's right on the masseter as shown mid-article here:

http://cioffredi.com/tmd/

And thank you for posting! Every idea is a good one for me here in terms of feeling less hopeless. 

1Caerulea-Lawrence
Yeah, that would be highly irregular, but it seems to have happened. If you google masseter and lymf-nodes it shows up - but I am not able to read journals, so maybe I missed something. But it seemed more gradual not so sudden like yours.  Yeah, I was hoping for it to be hopegiving. And also, it did take me a long while to notice the connection. The body doesn't really come with a written manual, so when things go awry it is hard to find out why; and I was surprised how much of a negative impact something like sleeping with earbuds, using earphones and the like had on how much I clenched my jaw. So, maybe it can help you in some way to listen, even though it might take a long time to understand what your body wants.   I do hope you find something that is useful, as chronic pain is no joke. And my reply is a way of normalizing it too, you're not alone in wanting a manual, preferably digital, nicely organized, with images, do-it-yourself tips and who and where to get help if you need a professional hand.  With regards to the symptoms  you mentioned, that are far from the face, for years I had this weird sensation of time slowing time and some intense deja vu, and also some kind of dryness in my mouth, but subtle. Since it happened seldomly, but regularly, I felt into it - and lo and behold - I found out something that matched: Biting a pillow.  I'm not sure why, but it is a terrible sensation, even as a grown up. So, I assume I did that for whatever reason as a child, and it stuck in my system. After I found out why, and bit a pillow for reference, it stopped happening. Now I just don't do it, because it really sucks. Best wishes.

I've been a Wikipedia editor with various degrees of activity for... checking now... wow... 16 years. I'm somewhat unresolved about the cadre of editors that work on all things "alternative medicine" there (mostly people with the userbox linked here). My current model is that they're not granular enough about various degrees of alternative, it's too binary the way they  Like  there's currently two buckets on Wikipedia (alternative and not-alternative) there should be a few buckets: 

(1) evidence decidedly against--it's been studied and was fo... (read more)

1green_leaf
There seems to be more - specifically on the massage, it says "is not supported by good evidence," which seems to be a different category from pseudoscience, but I agree with you.
Load More