We don't know, but isn't that kinda the point? If you're gambling essentially with some 10 bn human lives, any probability of drastically unpredictable, possibly negative, paradigm-obliterating outcomes above 0.00% is morally unacceptable, and should be seen as just cause to slow this headlong rush toward AGI. The biggest decision in history with consequences for so many, is the least appropriate decision to be made so utterly unilaterally, by so few. If this goes ahead, and a handful of Silicon Valley CEOs and shareholders decide to impose a different and... (read more)
We don't know, but isn't that kinda the point? If you're gambling essentially with some 10 bn human lives, any probability of drastically unpredictable, possibly negative, paradigm-obliterating outcomes above 0.00% is morally unacceptable, and should be seen as just cause to slow this headlong rush toward AGI. The biggest decision in history with consequences for so many, is the least appropriate decision to be made so utterly unilaterally, by so few. If this goes ahead, and a handful of Silicon Valley CEOs and shareholders decide to impose a different and... (read more)