Thanks, appreciated.
My expectation is not that one should cite the generally relevant research. Rather, one is expected to quickly browse, at least by similar keywords, the existing literature for seemingly closely related works. If anything comes up, there are a few options.
Just mention the work - this shows the reader that you've at least browsed around, but also gives the opportunity to somebody else to explore that relevant angle. Arguably, interpretability researchers that aim at actually figuring out model internals must be aware of formal verific
Thanks, appreciated. My expectation is not that one should cite the generally relevant research. Rather, one is expected to quickly browse, at least by similar keywords, the existing literature for seemingly closely related works. If anything comes up, there are a few options.