As Elezier points out, You are indeed a part of physics. Likewise, it does not make sense to consider the future determined from a human's perspective.
Let me try to explain that. You can consider any system with fixed rules and constant initial conditions to be solvable. So if you consider a rock rolling down a hill. Given any time t, you can predict the position of the rock.
If you consider a human a system in this same way, we can expect an output for any given input, however the data is much too complex to be represented graphically. For example consider... (read more)
A system with fixed deterministic rules and known initial conditions has an outcome that can be predicted. OTOH, the rules of QM are as fixed--unchanging--as you like, but do not allow definite prediction of experience.
We don't know anything about FW, including whether it is determined by the environment.
As Elezier points out, You are indeed a part of physics. Likewise, it does not make sense to consider the future determined from a human's perspective.
Let me try to explain that. You can consider any system with fixed rules and constant initial conditions to be solvable. So if you consider a rock rolling down a hill. Given any time t, you can predict the position of the rock.
If you consider a human a system in this same way, we can expect an output for any given input, however the data is much too complex to be represented graphically. For example consider... (read more)