All of Nihal M's Comments + Replies

1Calm Matter
I could have added +1, somehow missed this time, looking forward to next one.

Hi

Please walk to the back section of Matteo, and you'll find a sign pointing to our meet-up. I'll try to edit the description in future meetups to include this

1Neil
Fixed, thanks

Yeah, this post is for the one on May. 

There will be another meetup on Apirl(date TBD), for which ther will be a separate post. 

I've considered giving Sequence Spotlights a "Create Discussion Meetup" button, such that Sequence Spotlights more easily serve as default reading material for local communities. Would anyone be interested in that?


This sounds like something I'd be interested in running with my group. 

5Raemon
Cool. For the official feature I'll probably wait on seeing if other people would value it, but meanwhile you're definitely encouraged to create meetup reading groups based on recent spotlight items. 

Thanks for doing this. I enjoy listening to audio form of content, and this makes reading my backlog of lesswrong and EA content very accessible. 

Minor suggestion. - The podcast is hosted on multiple platforms, but is missing YouTube. There are several podcasts that are audio only on Youtube( Naval Ravikant's podcast, Cortex by CGP Gray, etc.). Adding it to you tube can increase reach to potential new listeners. 

1KatWoods
100% agreed! Definitely on the list of things to do. 

The EA group is active in bangalore as well AFAIK, one of the organizers attends the SSC meetup semi-regularly. The SSC group has been meeting regularly since 2018 when we discovered each other through the 2018 meetups everywhere post. 

You can DM me with your email address, and I'll add you to the mailing list and also share a signal invite link for chat. 

Meeting link for tomorrow's meetup - https://meet.around.co/r/bangalore-acx
Kindly DM/Email me before joining. 

Correction - The meetup is on 19th at 4PM. 

You can DM me if you're interested

1Nihal M
Meeting link for tomorrow's meetup - https://meet.around.co/r/bangalore-acx Kindly DM/Email me before joining. 

Hi Tejas, 

We meetup once a month, discuss the latest scott's essay or an older one. Sometimes we discuss stuff from Lesswrong or the adjacent blogosphere. Occasionally we read essays in the session itself, or have a casual conversation about current affairs with an ACX/LW POV. 

1Tejas Suresh
Thats super cool Nihal.Keep me in the loop regarding the meetups will try to attend the ones happening in the near future ,Are you active in the LW community from a long time ?I used to attend these effective altruism meetups that were happening around 4 years ago thats how I got to know about the LW community 

Reminder that the existing Bangalore meetup group is still active with monthly online meetups. You can join them by contacting me. 



 

1Tejas Suresh
Hey Nihal I'm from Bangalore what exactly happens in the meetups like what do you guys discuss .Good to know that the group is active :)

Flying Cars have larger safety consideration. The point on flying cars I made was a bit hyperbolic which was probably unnecessary in hindsight. 
 

Thinking out loud,
1. While Safety cars expand the risk envelope, the difference is not too much different either. I can expect a drunk driver to ram into a store or building at ground level these days, and I expect that living in the fourth floor of an apartment is safer cause there's no precedence for incidents like that. But someone crashing a vehicle to the ground floor or to the third floor can be ha... (read more)

Safety is a slippery slope. 

Misplaced excess concern over safety hinders technological progress, and is a slippery slope. 

Experts and regulators who are held accountable when things go wrong with new technology, and are thus incentivized to raise the bar or standards in an effort to make systems "more safe". 

This has detrimental effects in two ways -
- The slippery slope of adding more complex regulations or roadblocks in the name of safety. 
- Disincentivizing technology adoption and slowing progress.

 

Examples from experience :

  • Why w
... (read more)
2Dagon
I'd agree, especially about nuclear energy and perception of safety as opposed to actual safety.   For most examples, though, "it's complicated".   Many are a mix of safety concerns, NIMBY limitations, and legitimate worries about allocation of resources.   Drones (including passenger drones, not including human-piloted flying cars) are likely pretty safe, with less human harm per delivery than a low-paid contractor driving a truck.  But the airspace rights are hard to value and shouldn't be permanently given to one or a few companies who get there first.  And the ability to be outside without the sky having a bunch of distracting moving things always there is worth something too.
4ChristianKl
Flying cars are actually a safety problem. In cities they are also likely to be a noise problem with the technology that was available for a long time. Finally energy costs matter a lot for flying cars. The oil shock of the 70's reduced helicoptor usage and that never recovered.  

You're not alone. I know people who've tried this technique, and preferred to read things by themselves instead. 

For those who don't mind, and want to have a social reading habit, this can be a potentially useful format.

Hi, I don't look at this often, sorry for the late reply.

We usually discuss Scott's articles, and try to break down some topics discussed there, and some of the sequences.

It's a small group, so there aren't any expectations from the participants other than open discussion.

let me know if you plan on attending one, we have one scheduled this weekend.