All of NoahTheDuke's Comments + Replies

I've dropped out of college twice, and had considered that I would never go back (financial reasons, motivation reasons, doing "work" things with my life now). I decided with the new year that I would try to break into a new field, one which historically hasn't required a college degree but one definite helps (software development), and have found that businesses in my area look for one.

In talking with a friend in the field and one of the employers who turned me down, I went to the local community college and found that their course-work, their p... (read more)

This week, my therapist and I talked about the nature and subtleties of my major forms of akrasia, and have begun the conversation that I hope will help me change or break them. After years of trying to deal with these problems by myself, it's oddly freeing to be beholden to someone else and also to have someone who is committed but not emotionally bound to me and my success.

My focus this week is to think of possible mantras that I could use to stay on task and begin (if not complete) tasks I know I need to do but I don't want to do. Lots of rereading of the anti-akrasia threads here.

1ahel
Let us know your findings!

follow them all and you can't use words wrongly.

I don't understand. I thought the purpose was to develop rules for writing definitions of words, not for using words. What have I missed? Or maybe, how would this list look were it to be written as maxims for writing?

2mathnerd314
If you require every word you use to have a definition, and ensure the definitions follow these rules, and then consistently use the words according to their definitions, then it follows that you are using the words correctly and not wrongly. So I guess that could be the maxims for writing: * know the definition of every word you use * ensure the definitions follow these 17 rules * use words according to their definition

Even SpaceChem? Note, I haven't played Deadly Rooms of Death, but SpaceChem is currently the most difficult "puzzle" game I've ever played.

0Scott Garrabrant
I am not sure, I've played some of space-chem, but did not finish it.(I did not get stuck, I just stopped.) I haven't finished all the official DLC of DROD yet either, and have been actively trying for a long time. If someone feels they have played enough of both, they should let us know. It might not be comparable, because they both might just get harder and harder depending on how much you try to optimize. I have been stuck on the same DROD room for days, and in the official games and DLC, there are over 2000 rooms.

Oh, how close to me! (I'm in Hartford.)

I'll find out my next week's work schedule today, and then edit this post, but hopefully I can make this work!

Nevermind, I have work. Hopefully I'll be free next time.

[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply

I'd love to hear more about the bot. How does it work? Where is it run? Can others access it too?

9daenerys
I don't speak Computer, but this is the bot: http://aaronparecki.com/articles/2011/02/12/1/loqi-the-friendly-irc-bot We use him in a company hipchat room, and I don't know if he has been altered/reprogrammed in any way to run auctions.

I worked top-to-bottom, without change. If a new branch grew higher than my previous cuts, I focused it immediately. I know there's an optimal way, but I'm not quite clever enough to think of it.

3Vulture
Well, for this applet the optimal strategy might depend heavily on how exactly its tameness is executed, which isn't very enlightening. Edit: Derp, I tried out top-to-bottom and got it in 572. Definitely better than left-to-right or normals-first-ltr.

670? Lucky. I finally bested it after 1750-ish, yesterday. Once I hit 1000, I thought, "Why am I doing this? What am I proving?" and then I started clicking again.

3Vulture
1750? I forced myself to give up and get back to work somewhere around the 6500 mark. (I had decided, somewhere around 1000 or so, to try out the strategy of preferring to cut normal rather than dire heads when possible. Maybe that's a bad idea)

Oh, I see. Okay, this all makes a lot more sense now. Thanks for the clarification.

Well, "gwern" a name I'd only seen associated with our fellow poster, and from what I've read (related to his adventures with The Silk Road), it seems like he's tried to stay relatively detached from his real-life identity, so I didn't assume that this Gwern is also our gwern. Makes sense, though.

7[anonymous]
Gwern Branwen is not called Gwern Branwen, so the real-life identity is protected.
5ygert
How many Gwern Branwens do you know of? (Yes, it is.)

Or if you're not rich enough for Judgment under Uncertainty, try his latest work: Thinking, Fast and Slow. I found it to be just as informative, and more engaging than the classic.

I took the survey, and did all of the extra credit work too!

That IQ test seemed really silly, but I've never taken one before, so who knows?

Wow, I hadn't heard of Nozbe before. That looks very nice.

I also really like your beginning of the day checklists, because I find myself floundering a lot with getting started on my lists, and having them set up like you have them might just do the trick. Thanks for the brightening of what needs to be done.

1moridinamael
Thanks, I'd be interested to hear how starting the day with a checklist works for you. If you come up with any generally useful checklist items that I haven't included, please share them!

If you could specially mark interbook links and internet links so that they're visually different, that'd be nice. I'm working my way through an unofficial epub of the sequences, and I'm never sure if the blue link will take me to another chapter, or open the browser and ruin my reading experience.

2alexvermeer
I like this idea. I've had the same problem with the current epub, where clicking non-internal links (without realizing they're non-internal) takes me to my Kindle's (rather aweful) internet browser.
2Decius
Warning Obligatory link

More compactly this is called "Hitler Ate Sugar".

But what needs to be done? Maybe what needs to be done requires three times your life savings, and you must produce it or fail.

The whole post, I kept thinking, "But what's the difference? What's it actually look like?" And then I got to this line, and it crystallized. Brutal.