All of nwinter's Comments + Replies

nwinter347

I think that both these clauses are very standard in such agreements. Both severance letter templates I was given for my startup, one from a top-tier SV investor's HR function and another from a top-tier SV law firm, had both clauses. When I asked Claude, it estimated 70-80% of startups would have a similar non-disparagement clause and 80-90% would have a similar confidentiality-of-this-agreement's-terms clause.  The three top Google hits for "severance agreement template" all included those clauses.

These generally aren't malicious. Terminations get m... (read more)

nwinter113

Right, Quantified Mind tests are not normed, so you couldn't say "participants added 10 IQ points" or even "this participant went from 130 to 140".

However, they do have a lot of data from other test-takers, so you can say, "participants increased 0.7 SDs [amidst the population of other QM subjects]" or "this participant went from +2.0 to +2.7 SDs", broken down very specifically by subskill.  You are not going to get any real statistical power using full IQ tests.

In terms of saturating the learning effect, that's a better approach, but getting people t

... (read more)

Awesome! It's on an old version of Google App Engine, so not very vulnerable to that form of data loss, but it is very vulnerable to code rot, and needs to be migrated.  (It was originally running on quantified-mind.com, but he hasn't thought about it a long time and let the domain expire.)

Is that upgrade process something you could help with? The underlying platform is pretty good, and he put a lot time into adapting gold-standard psychometric tests in a way that allows for easy, powerful Quantified-Self-style experimentation, but the project doesn't have a maintainer.

1lemonhope
Yes I can help with that. Will DM
nwinter1613

People to help me get better psychometrics, the variance in my dataset is huge and my tests stop working at 3 STDs of IQ, for the most part. I'd love to have one or two more comprehensive tests that are sensitive to analyses up to 5 STDs

A friend of mine made https://quantified-mind.appspot.com/ for measuring experiments like this (I helped with the website). It sounds like a good fit for what you're doing.  You can have create an experiment, invite subjects to it, and have them test daily, at the same time of day, for perhaps 5-15 minutes a day, for a... (read more)

2George3d6
The problem with dyi tests is that they have no external validation -- during my initial experiment I actually had a 5 min test I did 2x a day (generated so it was new problems each time) -- but the results from that don't really make sense to anyone but myself, hence why I've chosen to forgo doing it.   In terms of saturating the learning effect, that's a better approach, but getting people to put their time into doing that makes it even harder.
1lemonhope
I think it might be easier to improve on high-level IQ tests than low-level ones in a way that's still real and valuable. I am not sure how one would design more practice-resistant high-level tests. It might be too hard.
3lemonhope
I would love to help your friend set up a backup system at a secondary datacenter if the data is all in one datacenter!
nwinter30

I talked to someone building the browser plugin version of this a year ago. Sorry, I don't remember what it was called.

nwinter00

I'll be there, too. Having a Less Wrong sign would be good.