I have a doubt regarding the implications of Beckers' paper on abstractions. I am a lawyer by profession so I'm venturing pretty far afield here, and I hope my question will not be too trivial.
Given that every constructive abstraction is also a τ - abstraction, there must be some surjective function τU that is compatible with τ . Hence, for constructive abstractions, must there also be mappings τ1U,…,τnU such that, τU(→uL)=τ1U(→z1U)⋅…⋅τn... (read more)
[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply
Dear John Wentworth:
I have a doubt regarding the implications of Beckers' paper on abstractions. I am a lawyer by profession so I'm venturing pretty far afield here, and I hope my question will not be too trivial.
Given that every constructive abstraction is also a τ - abstraction, there must be some surjective function τU that is compatible with τ . Hence, for constructive abstractions, must there also be mappings τ1U,…,τnU such that, τU(→uL)=τ1U(→z1U)⋅…⋅τn... (read more)