All of troll's Comments + Replies

Possible things to consider are:

It's assumed that you go to App Academy with the interest of getting a high paying job without paying too much for that opportunity, and being very confident of your success.

It's also assumed you want to be able to program, and would imagine it to be fun in the future, if it is not already.

Humans acclimate to conditions relatively quickly.

It's relatively easy to improve your living conditions with earplugs, night eyewear, and a mattress cover.

Having people around you to debug when you are too exhausted to is a significant boon for progression in programming skill.

That said, it's understandable if your values differ.

They don't have actual housing.

There are three rooms and one open space to put beds / storage in.

80%+ of beds are air mattresses people bought at Target.

Living at the office means you have to sign up at a nearby gym if you wish to shower.

It also means no privacy.

The showers in the nearest gym occasionally turn to cold water. (about 1 in 15 times)

The nearest gym is ~7 mins away walking and costs $130 for three months membership.

There are no housing costs.

Lights typically go off at 11 pm - 12 am

Residents have to wash dishes and take out the trash, and genera... (read more)

-3Jiro
May I ask why your name is "troll"? That name highly suggests "I actually called myself a troll right in my username and those idiots at LW didn't even realize I'm a troll when it's right there in front of them in black and white".
2Said Achmiz
Thank you for the info. I guess the takeaway here is that when someone on LessWrong talks about something being an obvious win, I should take it with a grain of salt, and assume a strong prior probability of this person just having very different values from me.

Not in trash anymore. However, there is a never version in the form of a bread recipe here.

I don't really think of my identity when I do things. I don't notice it at all.

I just assume I'm always in a calm analytic mode of thinking, even when I subconsciously know that's not the case.

Others view my identity with disgust and immediately dismiss what I have to say. I'm not really sure anything would help bring my point across correctly.

There will always be people who don't have time for you and aren't in a learning mindset, or just don't see you as anything other than an antagonist when you start trying to have a real conversation or suggest new th... (read more)

1Viliam_Bur
Given these two options, would you rather: a) do more convincing, but be less successful at it; or b) do less convincing, but be more successful at it. Where by (b) I mean not only more successful per person, but globally. For example, in (a) you speak with 100 people and you convince 1, in (b) you speak with 10 people and you convince 3. If (b) is your preferred option, you may try to frame all refraining from arguing as moving from (a) to (b). The less you push people, the more likely they are to listen what you say. Also, if you argue for fewer cases, they are more likely to remember those cases, but if you argue for many cases, they are likely to remember you simply as a person who always argues.
1Ben_LandauTaylor
I think you're describing a different issue than I was, or possibly a different facet of the same issue. It looks like you're talking about the signals we send to others, while this essay was about the signals we send to ourselves. In both cases, being aware of those signals is probably the single most important step. I don't understand what you mean by "standpoints and arguing," here. I might or might not be able to help if I had a better idea what you were looking for.
0metatroll
Paul Donovan

My standard way of dealing with internet names is to just ignore them completely because they don't provide much evidence/usefulness (unless I want to reference the person) and I want to read the comment anyway. I guess I thought LWers would either not notice my name at all or see it, be a little more suspicious, and read anyway. (not immediately downvote or tell me my name sucks and I should change it)

AFAICT, you're looking at posts anyway, so good/bad natured names shouldn't matter, only good/bad natured writing.

Yup. I did that first thing.

But how do I sort the comments by new (and as a list?) Seeing only new comments is useful, but what about chronological ordering for all comments?

5endoself
(function($) {if($('.new-comment').length > 0) { var time = function(c) { return parseInt(jQuery(c).find('.comment-date').attr('time')); }; var new_comments = $('.new-comment').sort(function(a, b) { return time(b) - time(a); }); $('.realcomment').after(new_comments); }})(jQuery); This should work. I put the newest ones first, but you can switch that by changing time(b) - time(a) to time(a) - time(b)

Open thread? What?

Nice! How do I go about adding a feature to the site that everyone can use?

4Qiaochu_Yuan
This guy.

Thanks!

Is there any way to make this a little more automatic for the future?

5endoself
You can make it into a bookmarklet and add it to your bookmarks bar. I don't know what browser you're looking for, but you can google for specific instructions if you don't know how.

Greasemonkey or a browser extension that injects javascript?

0Bugmaster
How would it get the intro post, though ?

I guess a lot of people are interested enough in an account with the handle "troll" to check my first post, but not enough to not consider the name when reviewing posts.

4Bugmaster
Realistically, when someone replies to one of my posts on some long thread, I don't take the time to click through their handle and find their own intro post. I don't think that doing so is a good use of my time, and I believe that I am typical in this regard. However, I do take the time to read their handle, and if it seems to say "I am not arguing in good faith", I take notice. This gives me an idea for a new Less Wrong feature, though: allow users to enter a short descriptions of themselves, and display it when the mouse hovers over their handle for a certain amount of time. I know how I'd implement it with jQuery, but I'm not sure how easy it would be to plug into the LW general architecture.

I expect people to know what a troll is based on cultural knowledge. I expect them to not care due to this being LW.

4ArisKatsaris
The choice of a name can provide some evidence about whether it's a good-faith account or not; and the name "troll" is providing evidence against. If you told people why you chose that name that might serve to counteract the effect, but I think you've not yet done so... Needing to justify your nick may seem unfair to you, but consider it from the point of view of someone who doesn't know you.
9Shmi
Consider your second expectation falsified and update on it, as a "bayesian rationalist" would.
6Vaniver
Illusion of transparency seems relevant; even if you know why you picked that username, others can only guess, and their guess should be expected to match their experience, not your private knowledge.

That's in a tree. (new posts under old ones won't be before the old ones)

0Richard_Kennaway
The issues you are raising have been thoroughly aired here in the past. It isn't helpful to barge in and propose rearranging the furniture just because you don't see why it is the way it is. For some of the background I suggest this posting. There is certainly room for useful discussion of how LessWrong should be run, but it has to start from where it is. Right. Which meaning of "should" is that? Now. I've written the above on the hypothesis that you are not exactly what you call yourself, a troll. But the evidence is not favourable. You pre-emptively shot yourself in the foot by choosing that handle, posted a bio consisting of a list of what are hurrah keywords on LessWrong, accumulated some karma with innocuous postings, then started posting stuff that instantly gets downvoted out of sight. If you are genuine, you need to change something. That is not something that I will say twice.
1mwengler
Intentionally or not you just described the karma system at fool.com (which they call recommendations). As a long time poster there it does have its uses: there are some extremely prolix boards where I skip through reading only the high rec posts, and don't have to worry about being "shielded" from controversial ideas like you get with the system here. If i were putting someone else's karma system in here, I would put in stackexchange.com They have downvoting, but it costs the downvoter karma. So you don't get things mindlessly downvoted just because they don't kowtow. But actual low quality stuff is downvoted by high-karma individuals. The recent improvement of showing pctage of downvotes here is nice. I think I would go the last step and "decorate" the up and down vote buttons with the total number of existing up and down votes. This would also be slightly more compact than the current system where I have points reported on top of comment, and then uninformative buttons below the post. And I would by scanning upvote totals be able to use recs in the way you want them used, if I wanted to ignore downvotes.
3drethelin
Spite exists, and people do things out of spite. That doesn't mean punishment shouldn't exist. If you don't stop being friends with anyone ever you will be abused and used and forced to spend time with awful people. Total karma isn't for you, it's for everyone else.

I've had an identical project for a few months now.

A spreadsheet (under Edward) for ingredients and supplements for my shake which is missing potassium and fiber. (which are provided for with KCl salt and oats) RDAs are also not fixed for 1.5x caloric intake.

This is designed with weightlifting, preparation time, mobility, and close to 3000 cals/day in mind.

Overall cost is $3.84/day/person.

Tastes like thicker strawberry milk.

Updated spreadsheet with price distribution and complete RDAs (except phosphorous/pantathenic acid). $4.36/day/person

I expect the pric... (read more)

2VAuroch
Your spreadsheet for the updated version is in your trash folder. Is there a newer version?
0cursed
Awesome, I'm creating my own recipe based off of yours. Do you mix all of your ingredients together, including the chicken and the supplements?

How do you know motivation is multiplicative?

I have and I have submitted an application.

If you mean 'against people who are contrarian', no. If you mean 'for popular opinions', no.

There are a few other reasons I could be formatting my introduction that way, such as being bad at English or writing in general. I used "minimalist" both as a heads up for the format and to draw away from the other possible explanations.

1DSimon
Anti-contrarian?

minimalist, 17, white, male, autodidact, atheist, libertarian, california, hacker, studying computer science, reading sequences, intellectual upbringing, 1 year bayesian rationalist, motivation deficient, focusing on skills, was creating something similar to bayesian rationality before conversion, have read hpmor (not intro to lw), interested in contributing to ai research in the future

2Bugmaster
You weren't kidding when you said "minimalist". Nicely done.

Consider restarting with a different account name. Trolling (that is, trying to provoke people) is not welcome here, and when your username is "troll", people will not (and should not) give you the benefit of doubt.

I'm sure you're aware at this point, but with that description you blend into the wallpaper.

Thank you for creating a comment to link "stereotypical Less Wrong reader". If only you were a couple of years older.

Since you're 17, have you looked into the week-long summer camp?

The Identikit LessWrongian!

"Minimalist" is implied by the sparsity of the rest of the comment, and so is ironically redundant.

6MarkusRamikin
That handle bodes well.
6Emile
Welcome to LessWrong! (For a cheap way to give a better impression, you may want to switch to another user name)
5shokwave
Contrarian?