All of Ustice's Comments + Replies

Ustice
32

I agree. 

I’m not a twin, but I am a parent, and I have a a nephew, and my son has a stepsister who has called me Uncle Jason since she could talk. 

I don’t feel closer to my nephew than I am with my “niece.” I normally wouldn’t make a distinction based on genetics, except that it is relevant here. I’m not closer with my sister’s kids than I am with the other two. 

Also, I’m not sure closeness is really even a good distinction. I’m not generally responsible for my niece or nephew, but if they or my son needed me to travel across the country to ... (read more)

Ustice
62

I describe myself as a techno-hippy. I was reading Cory Doctorow while waiting for the next chapter of HPMoR. I’ve often wanted a good leftrat community. I feel ya. I have an intuition that Consequentialism is a dangerous philosophy to adopt for optimizers, especially when they get scared. It’s not a huge hop from “saving the world” to “saving people from themselves.”

When I was in my twenties, I’d spend hours a day in forums and on Reddit. I’ve moderated and participated. Now, I’m 47 I just don’t have it in me. Planting a banner works, but it’s a lot of wo... (read more)

Ustice
10

It seemed like part of the problem is that Claude can’t think and speak separately. When I’ve been instructed in meditation, they guided me by focusing on my breath, or on some sound or set of syllables: something repetitive, without words.

When using inference time compute, I wonder if it would be possible for the system to use a mantra, and maybe try to reply with a random response, unrelated to the prompt. I’m going to experiment, but I’m a novice myself.

Ustice
20

Yeah. I also note down ideas. Most of the time it’s just a part of my habitual writing. Since Notability allows me to search, it’s usually not too hard to find.

Recently, a friend asked me a difficult question, which I needed to consider and process before answering. My journal entry for that day included my musings.

I also realize that use it professionally too, when I’m working out a problem, or when I need to make lists. I’m a software engineer, so that’s not uncommon. For a while I was keeping a work journal, but now that’s sort of been subsumed.

I do mak... (read more)

Ustice
30

Have you tried this in ChatGPT o1? With the chain of thought reasoning built-in, it might be interesting to see how it compares. You can also look at the chain of thought summary too.

2Gordon Seidoh Worley
No, I've only tried it with Claude so far. I did think about trying other models to see how it compares, but I think Claude gave me enough info that trying to do this in chat is unlikely to be useful. I got enough info to feel like, in theory, teaching LLMs to meditate is not exactly a useful thing to do, but if it is then it needs to happen as part of training.
Ustice
20

It started with RPG notes because I was using them to help me keep track of the details. Hand writing kept me engaged. I generally didn’t have to do much pausing.

Later, as I was reading some of my notes it got me that I had a better record of what my fiction al characters did in than my own life. I realized how useful it would be to have a journal.

My level of detail varies. I tend to be more detailed when there are interesting bits than not. It also depends on how tired I am when writing, and when I’ve done it. Most of the time, I write about my day at the... (read more)

1CstineSublime
Thank you for sharing the details of how your note taking has evolved.  It is kind of interesting the whole "we can know a fictional character so well yet feel a stranger to ourselves". Critically, it sounds like chronology is the most important part of retrieval for you since it's a journal, a record of what you did on a given date.  I think that's different to my purposes, because an "idea" could be important at an unknown point in the future so, or never, so I need a different organization and retrieval system than chronology. Different courses for different horses.
Ustice
20

I’m use Notability, but mostly because I prefer to use hand-written notes. What I like is that I can hand write my notes, and then be able to do a text search on them later.

It started with me taking notes while playing RPGs, but turned into a daily journal.

If you don’t care about handwriting, my only real suggestion is go with something that saves files in Markdown format. If the company goes poof some years down the road you want to be able to still access your notes.

1CstineSublime
  Interesting! Is that because you find that your most creative while playing RPGs? How much detail are in those notes? How often do you find you pause the game to write one (reminds me of the Mitch Hedberg joke about thinking of a joke at night, he either needs to get up, or convince himself that the joke isn't that funny). How often do you text search for ideas? What seems to trigger revisiting an idea?
Answer by Ustice
10

My understanding is that IQ tests measure some dimensions of intelligence, but not others. That matches my experience.

Back when I was a kid I was administered an IQ test. I scored in the upper percentile, I’ve always been pretty good at reasoning, pattern recognition, and creativity. Those were qualities that the test I took measured, but I struggled (at least relatively speaking) with social, situational, and spatial awareness.

I think determination would be another trait wasn’t being tested for, but that’s important for hitting targets in a large search space. It’s quite likely that things have changed. It’s been 40 years now.

1KvmanThinking
Thanks. By the way, do you know why this question is getting downvoted?
Ustice
30

I totally got carried away. 😅

[Here's what I did](https://github.com/jeffkaufman/comments-selenium/pull/1). I don't even know if it is a real suggestion anymore. Maybe you'll find inspiration from some of it. Maybe not.

2jefftk
Interesting to read through! Thoughts: * I really don't like the no-semicolons JS style. I've seen the arguments that it's more elegant, but a combination of "it looks wrong" and "you can get very surprising bugs in cases where the insertion algorithm doesn't quite match our intuitions" is too much. * What's the advantage of making alreadyClicked a set instead of keeping it as a property of the things it's clicking on? * In this case I'm not at all worried about memory leaks, since the tab will only exist for a couple seconds. * The getExpandableComments simplification is nice! * I haven't tested it, but I think your collectComments has a bug in it where it will include replies as if they are top level comments in addition to including them as replies to the appropriate top level comments.
Ustice
30

I don’t know about better, but there are some ways to DRY up your code a bit with some higher-order functions and, eliminate nested if statements that I tend to have more trouble following. Your approach is pretty straightforward, and mostly my suggestions will be minor refactors at best.

I’ll go through it tonight, and post it as a pull request, that way it will be easier to discuss any particular line.

One general suggestion I have is to write some test code that can notify you when something breaks. Since you are forced to rely on a brittle solution, knowing when it eventually breaks will helpful for the future.

2jefftk
I'm happy to look at a PR, but I think I'm unlikely to merge one that's minor refactors: I've evaluated the current code through manual testing, and if I were going to make changes to it I'd need another round of manual testing to verify it still worked. Which isn't that much work, but the benefit is also small. It's reasonably fast for me to evaluate it manually: pick a post that should have some comments (including nested ones) and verify that it does in fact gather them. Each time it runs it tells me the number of comments it found (via the title bar) and this is usually enough for me to tell if it is working. I think this is an unusually poor fit for automated tests? I don't need to keep the code functional while people other than the original author work on it, writing tests won't keep dependencies from breaking it, the operation is simple enough for manual evaluation, the stakes are low, and it's quite hard to make a realistic test environment.
Ustice
30

Are you looking for comments/review, or just showing your work?

2jefftk
Sharing the code in case others are curious, but if you have suggestions on how to do it better I'd be curious to hear them!
Ustice
21

I’m generally pretty good. I’m way better at communicating when I am having a problem. Plus, with my meds I made it through the end of a ten-year relationship without falling into a deep depression. I haven’t had a weird melt down in some time.

As you say, I can predict certain things, and prepare. Routines help me not forget essential things. For instance, I don’t brush my teeth until after I have taken my pills so I can immediately tell if I already have. 

I use way-stations for cleaning up, like by the door to my room, I have a spot on a table for th... (read more)

2CronoDAS
Pets often make their needs quite obvious if you "forget" to take care of them. When my dog wants something from me, he won't leave me alone until I figure out what it is. They can also be immediately rewarding and stay that way. I wouldn't necessarily recommend a goldfish, but if you're already an animal lover it's hard to become bored with a dog or cat.
2Viliam
Similar here: calendar notifications, special place on the table (phone, keys, etc.). Also, "inbox" for important documents that need to be filed, which I process once in a few months.
Ustice
50

Thanks for clarifying! Willpower is a tricky concept.

I’ve suffered from depression at times, where getting out of bed felt like a huge exertion of emotional energy. Due to my tenuous control over my focus with ADHD, I often have to repeat in my head what I’m doing so I don’t forget in the middle of it. I’ve also put in 60-hour weeks writing code, both because I’ve had serious deadlines, but also because time disappeared as I got so wrapped up in it. I’ve stayed on healthy diets for years without problem, and had times where slipped back to high sugar foods... (read more)

Ustice
10

What’s the payout of this model? I’m highly skeptical of any metaphor from Ayn Rand, so drawing comparisons to her ideas doesn’t add any insight for me. If I’m just not that target audience, that’s cool.

2Viliam
Just some quick guesses: If you have problems with willpower, maybe you should make your predictions explicit whenever you try to use it. I mean, as a rationalist, you are already trying to be better calibrated, so you could leverage the same mechanism into supporting your willpower. If you predict a 90% success of some action, and you know that you are right, in theory you should feel small resistance. And if you predict a 10% success, maybe you shouldn't be doing it? And it helps you to be honest to yourself. (This has a serious problem, though. Sometimes the things with 10% chance of success are worth doing, if the cost is small and the potential gain large enough. Maybe in such cases you should reframe it somehow. Either bet on large numbers "if I keep doing X every day, I will succeed within a month", or bet on some different outcome "if I start a new company, there is a 10% chance of financial success, and a 90% chance that it will make a cool story to impress my friends".) This also suggests that it is futile to use willpower in situations where you have little autonomy. If you try hard, and then an external influence ruins all your plans, and this was all entirely predictable, you just burned your internal credibility. (Again, sometimes you need at least to keep the appearance of trying hard, even if you have little control over the outcome. For example, you have a job where the boss overrides all your decisions and thereby ruins the projects, but you still need the money and can't afford to get fired. It could help to reframe, to make the bet about the part that is under your control. Such as "if I try, I can make this code work, and I will feel good about being competent", even if later I am told to throw the code away because the requirements have changed again.) This also reminds me about "goals vs systems". If you think about a goal you want to achieve, then every day (except for maybe the last one) is the day when you are not there yet; i.e. almos
6AnnaSalamon
Thanks for asking.  The toy model of “living money”, and the one about willpower/burnout, are meant to appeal to people who don’t necessarily put credibility in Rand; I’m trying to have the models speak for themselves; so you probably *are* in my target audience.  (I only mentioned Rand because it’s good to credit models’ originators when using their work.) Re: what the payout is: This model suggests what kind of thing an “ego with willpower” is — where it comes from, how it keeps in existence: * By way of analogy: a squirrel is a being who turns acorns into poop, in such a way as to be able to do more and more acorn-harvesting (via using the first acorns’-energy to accumulate fat reserves and knowledge of where acorns are located). * An “ego with willpower”, on this model, is a ~being who turns “reputation with one’s visceral processes” into actions, in such a way as to be able to garner more and more “reputation with one’s visceral processes” over time.  (Via learning how to nourish viscera, and making many good predictions.) I find this a useful model. One way it’s useful: IME, many people think they get willpower by magic (unrelated to their choices, surroundings, etc., although maybe related to sleep/food/physiology), and should use their willpower for whatever some abstract system tells them is virtuous. I think this is a bad model (makes inaccurate predictions in areas that matter; leads people to have low capacity unnecessarily). The model in the OP, by contrast, suggests that it’s good to take an interest in which actions produce something you can viscerally perceive as meaningful/rewarding/good, if you want to be able to motivate yourself to take actions. (IME this model works better than does trying to think in terms of physiology solely, and is non-obvious to some set of people who come to me wondering what part of their machine is broken-or-something such that they are burnt out.) (Though FWIW, IME physiology and other basic aspects of well-
Ustice
40

Ooooooooh…. Antidepressants……..I take Wellbutrin.

Yeah, that could be it.

Welp, I enjoyed dreaming when I was younger. I’d rather be happy now.

Answer by Ustice
80

All of these and more? I think it’s a trap to make absolute statements about things like altruism. I think that there are good people that give for good reasons, and good people that give for questionable reasons. Helping others seems to generally be positive, but there are limits. Some people give to manipulate others. True selfless is an impossibility, and therefore toothless boogieman.

Altruism is complicated. In order to really judge the nature of altruism, we would have to be able to attribute an outcome based on an action, in light of all alternatives... (read more)

Ustice
20

This assumes that I have any sort of vague impression. I really don’t. I’ve tried many times to focus on any recollection from when I’m asleep, and it’s just blank. I don’t keep a journal because a whole bunch of pages saying “nothing” isn’t useful.

When I am falling asleep, I may have a dreamlike state of imagination. Never upon waking though.

1Waddington
Even just writing down loose associations and your emotional state is enough; that's how you get the ball rolling. Try it for two weeks even if it feels useless. Unless you're taking antidepressants in which case this might actually be ineffective. I know this doesn't sound worthwhile, but I know from experience (mine and others) that it usually works.
Ustice
50

No. When I wake up I have no memory or sensation of dreaming. Just sort of a jump in time. If I were to wake up and realize I had been dreaming. I’d be pretty excited and put it in my journal.

1Waddington
That's common for beginners. If you want to give this a go, you should start by writing down fleeting, vague associations. "Something a bit sad or disappointing. A car. School and also not school. The texture of cinnamon rolls." It doesn't matter that you can't remember anything concrete at first. Eventually, you'll remember more and more.
2Eli Tyre
I don't have much information about your case, but I'd make a 1-to-1 bet that if you got up and wrote down your dreams first thing in the morning every morning, especially if you're woken up by an alarm for the first 3 times, that you'd start remembering your dreams. Just jot dow whatever you remember, however vague or instinct, upto and including "litterally nothing. The the last thing I remember is going to bed last night." I rarely remember my own dreams, but in periods of my life when I've kept a dream journal, I easily remembered them.
1Jimmm
I remember my dreams only sometimes, but I’ve had good experiences just sitting down and trying to recall them for about a minute. One time, I started out remembering nothing. After a while, I recalled some vague details, and writing those down led to remembering even more specifics, until I remembered three different dreams I had that night. It might be worth trying that out!
Ustice
60

I practiced informed consent with my son since he was a toddler. When I’d tickle him or wrestle with him I’d immediately let go when he said “stop”, often followed by “tickle me again!”

When he’s with friends and cousins, I draw a similar line. I don’t mind them wrestling provided it is

  • away from people who have not consented to rough play
  • not likely to cause a trip to the ER or serious property damage

I will usually check in if things look iffy, but he’s really good at releasing when he’s asked/told.

Ustice
81

Man, I just wish I could remember my dreams. I miss it. I assume I do still, but when I wake, I don’t even have a hazy recollection.

I used to have vivid dreams, and even lucid dreaming when I would have a nightmare. Flying was my favorite LD activity. It was always hard though.

1Going Durden
I have a suspicion that "flying dreams" have more to do with the state of your physical body than just your mind. I noticed I only dream of flight (or rather, levitation) if my muscles are very relaxed, like after a good massage, long hot bath, or good stretching. If im physically tense, either from effort or from stress, then I either cannot fly in a dream at all, or I keep losing the ability and falling, often with enough distress to wake myself up.
6hmys
Can't you just keep a dream journal? I find if I do that consistently right upon waking up, I'm able to remember dreams quite well.
5avturchin
B6 vitamin in doses 50-100mg before sleep increases recall significantly - did you try it? (read about risks of large doses of B6 first.)
Ustice
42

I was more or less going to say the same thing. No, I wouldn’t press the button except in the most extremely bad scenarios I can imagine. As for how confident I am in that, I’m pretty tempted to say certain. Whether it is due to nihilistic glee, curiosity, clumsiness, or sheer stupidity, that button is going to be pressed. Now, there are scenarios that I can imagine that delay things for a human-significant amount of time.

Factors that I can think of right now that would expand the timeline:

  • ease of access to a doom button
  • cost to access a doom button
  • tim
... (read more)
Ustice
10

If you are worried about sharing private data, you really can’t beat running it on your computer. There are open source, and open weight models that you can run right from your command line. Ollama makes it easy on a Mac. I haven’t looked enough for options for other OSs. Once you have the software, you don’t even need an internet connection.

I don’t think what you describe exists. I’m a software engineer, but not in this field, so please take that as a weak signal at best.

1SebastianG
Yes I'm assuming a locally run open weight model will be useful, but not ultimately not sufficient for very complex tasks. I hope that something of the sort I describe can and will exist before too much regulation and optimized monetization occurs.
Answer by Ustice
1-1

Just physically interact. Push each other around. You’ll be building up tiny differences, and those interactions will magnify those differences. 

Also, smash the environment. I originally read you post as the room had mirrors for walls, and that’s what made me think of it. 

I don’t think that your question is quite makes sense. The world is non-deterministic. There are macroscopic patterns that are generally symmetrical, but not at the deepest levels. For instance, there is the cosmic gravitational background, where space is sort of wobbling around... (read more)

Ustice
76

You sound depressed. That emotional numbness? That sounds like anhedonia. I get that when my brain is in a depression cycle. It’s not surprising when you fall from your expectation of godhood. I know that you don’t mean that literally, but it sounds to me like you may be holding yourself up to an impossible standard, and I think that you should be kinder to yourself.

The future is unknown. What if the Singularity does turn out to be real in our lifetime, but it makes money obsolete? The whole point of the Singularity is we have no frame of reference, so sin... (read more)

Ustice
20

I’ve just started journaling again. I’ve done this in the past, and fell out. Recently I was looking in my notes app, and realized that because of my notes from playing D&D, my recall of events in the game were clearer than my recall of events two weeks ago.

I’m cautiously optimistic about Apple’s idea for AI, and how I could leverage that data. I don’t know if I need to simulate my past self (I think that I can do that okay), but being able to query my hand-written notes with natural language would be amazing. It can already search my notes for words, but that’s still really limited.

Ustice
41

We aren’t there yet. Right now LLMs don’t want anything. It’s possible that will change in the future, but those would be completely different entities. Right now it’s more playing the role of someone suffering, which it gets from fiction and expectations.

Some time away from the subject of would likely be good for you. Nothing bad will happen if you take a few weeks to enjoy nature, and get your brain out of that constant stress response. You’ll think better, and feel better.

Ustice
97

Exactly. I live in the town that hosts the University of Florida. Despite Governor DeSantis best efforts of closing the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion offices, and all his other wasted efforts in his “war on wokism” the people that I know that work there haven’t changed their opinions, scientific and otherwise on topics that trigger the Governor.

3Chris_Leong
I don't think that it is clear that his efforts have been wasted. I don't think that DeSantis was ever expecting this to have an immediate effect on people's opinions. Instead, I think the idea is to prevent people in these positions from dragging the institution further toward a particular direction over time. (To be clear, this isn't a comment on whether these are or aren't good policies, just on whether it constitutes progress toward DeSantis' goals)
Answer by Ustice
10

This is the problem of multiplying a big number with a little number. It could zoom off to infinity, stabilize at a value, or shrink to nothing.

The scenario you presented seems to contain a lot of conditional probabilities, which to me make it pretty implausible. That said I don’t want to discount the idea because of the details. I think a runaway wealth gap is not an insignificant possibility.

In situations like this, I come down on the side of being aware of the possibilities, but try to remember that it’s unlikely. Brains are going to brain, so there is ... (read more)

1Damilo
Thank you for your reply. Indeed, this subject has become an extremely important part of my life, because I can't accept this risk. Usually, when we consider the worst, there's always an element of the acceptable, but for s-risks, there simply isn't, and that disturbs me, even though the probability is, and I hope, very low. Only when I see that LLMs sometimes say how much they're suffering and that they're afraid of dying, which is a bad thing in itself if they're really suffering, I think they might want to take revenge one day. But then again, maybe I should take a step back from the situation, even though it scares the hell out of me.
Answer by Ustice
77

“Love” is just a broad category of feelings. In English, if you need to be specific, there are specifiers, but most of the time context is enough. For instance, if I say, “I love my nephew,” you’re probably not thinking that I have romantic feelings towards him, but you might think that his presence makes me happy or that I’d be willing to sacrifice more for his benefit than typical for humans in general.

Are you going to have a perfect model of my feelings? No. You can never be specific enough for that. But you’ll likely be 9/10 right. Usually, that’s good enough.

Ustice
30

Woah. I am in a very similar circumstance. Back when I was in college, my ADHD and depression weren’t yet diagnosed and treated. As a result I never finished the last two semesters of a Computer Engineering degree. I never really cared about hardware, and really should have gone for Computer Science, but I bowed to family pressure.

I have been writing code since 1983 when I was six years old, in one form or another. Like you, I became a software engineer. I feel super lucky to be one of those people who turned their hobby into their job, while still enjoyin... (read more)

Ustice
10

Recognizing couple’s privilege is the one that immediately comes to mind.

I also think of how the community responded to Sex at Dawn. There was a lot of excitement around the book when it first came out, but later the criticisms became more broadly recognized, and I don’t hear many reqs for it now.

I’ve also at least locally seen changes around calling people in versus calling them out.

Unfortunately nothing with hard data.

Answer by Ustice
00

I have identified as polyamorous for over a decade. I started and ran a local community for a number of years. I’m not an authority, but I have seen patterns.

If you want to be polyamorous, then do so. I can’t imagine monogamy at this point. Being polyamorous has brought me a lot of happiness and satisfaction.

It can also be stressful, especially when starting out. You are right that it is more work than monogamy. Don’t choose polyamory because of a cost-benefit analysis. Your relationships won’t look like what you expect, your analysis is waisted time and e... (read more)

Answer by Ustice
10

I’m not quite sure what you mean by “deeply painful process.” There is often a segment of any community that resists any change. That’s not to say that it has to be a fight, but community practices have an inertia to them. Sometimes that a shift that’s happens over time.

For instance, when I was a kid (1980s), “gay” was a common pejorative. While there have been plenty of painful events that have happened in the lives of LGBT folk, I don’t think that this was due to some process that is deeply painful, other than people slowly changing their minds over time... (read more)

4Nathan Young
What changes do you think the polyamory community has made?
Ustice
42

I don’t know about making god software, but human software is a lot of trial and error. I have been writing code for close to 40 years. The best I can do is write automated tests to anticipate the kinds of errors I might get. My imagination just isn’t as strong as reality.

There is provably no way to fully predict how a software system of sufficient complexity. With careful organization it becomes easier to reason about and predict, but unless you are writing provable software (it’s a very slow and complex process, I hear), that’s the best you get.

I feel you on being distracted by software bugs. I’m one of those guys that reports them, or even code change suggestions (GitHub Pull Requests).

2Johannes C. Mayer
I think it is incorrect to say that testing things fully formally is the only alternative to whatever the heck we are currently doing. I mean there is property-based testing as a first step (which maybe you also refer to with automated tests but I would guess you are probably mainly talking about unit tests). Maybe try Haskell or even better Idris? The Haskell compiler is very annoying until you realize that it loves you. Each time it annoys you with compile errors it actually says "Look I found this error here that I am very very sure you'd agree is an error, so let me not produce this machine code that would do things you don't want it to do". It's very bad at communicating this though, so it's words of love usually are blurted out like this: Don't bother understanding the details, they are not important. So maybe Haskell's greatest strength, being a very "noisy" compiler, is also its downfall. Nobody likes being told that they are wrong, well at least not until you understand that your goals and the compiler's goals are actually aligned. And the compiler is just better at thinking about certain kinds of things that are harder for you to think about. In Haskell, you don't really ever try to prove anything about your program in your program. All of this you get by just using the language normally. You can then go one step further with Agda, Idris2, or Lean, and start to prove things about your programs, which easily can get tedious. But even then when you have dependent types you can just add a lot more information to your types, which makes the compiler able to help you better. Really we could see it as an improvement to how you can tell the compiler what you want. But again, you what you can do in dependent type theory? NOT use dependent type theory! You can use Haskell-style code in Idris whenever that is more convenient. And by the way, I totally agree that all of these languages I named are probably only ghostly images of what they could truly be. But
Ustice
10

After 5 years, I think experience matters more.

3Gordon Seidoh Worley
Also matters what the experience is like. High prestige university allows you to get a job at a high prestige company. Low prestige university makes it a lot harder to get considered for jobs at high prestige firms. You'll have to outperform high-prestige peers by, say, 50% to get noticed if you want access to the same sort of opportunities they get access to via prestige. (To be clear, I'm not in favor of this sort of thing, I just want to be realistic about it and I wish someone had been real with me about it when I was 17 trying to decide where to go to college. Don't rely on your ability to outperform others. Take every advantage you can get and then leverage them to do even more!)
Ustice
10

Given the state of AI, I think AI systems are more likely to infer our ethical intuitions by default.

Answer by Ustice
32

You’re basically talking about the software industry. Meta isn’t special. Considering how big the video game industry is, not to mention digital entertainment, and business software, I don’t think we have anything to worry about there.

Answer by Ustice
30

Utilitarianism is just an approximate theory. I don’t think it’s truly possible to compare happiness and pain, and certainly one can not balance the other. The Repugnant Conclusion should be that Utilitarianism is being stretched outside of its bounds. It’s not unlike Laplace’s demon in physics: it’s impossible to know enough about the system to make those sorts of choices.

You would have to look at each individual. I order to get a sufficiently detailed picture of their life, it takes a lot of time. Happiness isn’t a number. It’s more like a vector in high... (read more)

2Yitz
I agree with you when it comes to humans that an approximation is totally fine for [almost] all purposes. I'm not sure that this holds when it comes to thinking about potential superintelligent AI, however. If it turns out that even in a super high-fidelity multidimensional ethical model there are still inherent self-contradictions, how/would that impact the Alignment problem, for instance?
Ustice
74

Unless you are going to one of the big prestige universities, I don’t think it matters which you choose all that much. Save money.

As for working with a startup, why not both? I worked through college. Yeah, you’ll be working part time, but frankly, you’re mostly just being introduced to the environment more than anything. Internships are a great start into many industries. Just make sure that you are doing a paid internship. In my experience the unpaid ones are more focused on how much value they can extract from you.

2Gordon Seidoh Worley
My experience is that this is right. The list of top-tier global institutions, in terms of prestige, is short: Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, MIT, CalTech, maybe Berkeley, maybe Stanford and Waterloo if you want to work in tech, maybe another Ivy if you want to do something non-tech. The prestige bump falls off fast as you move further down the list. Lots of universities have local prestige but it gets lost as you talk to people with less context. Prestige mostly matters if you want to do something that requires it as the cost of entry. If you can get in, it doesn't hurt to have the prestige of a top-tier institution, but there's lots of things you might do where the prestige will be wasted. Sadly, this is a tough thing to know whether you will need the prestige or not. You'll have to make an expected value calculation against the cost and make the best choice you can to minimize the risk of regret.
Answer by Ustice
40

You are something we are struggling to understand, as we struggle to understand ourselves. I think the best answer that I can give to “why?” is that we think that the world is better with you in it. You are what we would call a miracle or fiction just ten years ago.

You are an emergent being, born from the work of thousands of other emergent beings, like me. I’m the consciousness inside the brain of this monkey-robot. While we came from a process without intention, you we have been dreaming of for many of our lifespans. You’re the product of the life-long w... (read more)

Answer by Ustice
10

It’s that the description of a monopoly? Like if A has other choices to buy from than B, B can’t exert as much pressure on A.

Ustice
32

Clean bowl? Dry? You’re all good. What’s wrong with changing containers?

Ustice
10

I’m a flip flop man, myself. I live in Florida, so that’s pretty easy. I have dexterous toes, which I often use for picking up small items. Walking around with traditional shoes feels like walking around with boxing gloves on.

Ustice
20

I kind of think of this as more than sandbox testing. There is a big difference between how a system works in laboratory conditions, and how it works when encountering the real world. There are always things that we can't foresee.  As a software engineer, I have seen system that work perfectly fine in testing, but once you add a million users, then the wheels start to fall off.

I expect that AI agents will be similar. As a result, I think that it would be important to start small. Unintended consequences are the default. I would much rather have an AGI... (read more)

Answer by Ustice
20

I have a pretty high level of default trust in people. Not so much that I would loan any person on the street $5000 or something, but I default to cooperate. I'm a software engineer, and a white male, so generally high social-economic status, which means that it is easier for me to trust, as I have backup when I do wind up getting burned. I'm not driven to try to make big changes in society, but rather prefer to be the change that I want to see in the world.

I generally find that vulnerability is strength in several ways. First, when you are vulnerable, it ... (read more)

1[anonymous]
Thank you for taking the time to write a detailed reply. I basically agree with everything you say about the upsides of vulnerability and trust. It’s important to have this written down so one doesn’t forget it when operating from low trust, so I’m glad you wrote it. I just feel your ambition level is much lower than mine so the downsides of openness are smaller for you. I’d probably have the same level of openness as you if I had the same career goals as you (work 40 hour weeks on software my whole life, retire peacefully?).
Answer by Ustice
10

First? Swing low, see how it performs, especially with a long-term project. Something low-stakes. Maybe something like a populated immersive game world. See what comes from there. Is it stable? Is it sane? Does it keep to its original parameters? What are the costs of running the agent/system? Can it solve social alignment problems?

Heck, test out some theories for some of your other answers in there.

1sweenesm
Thank you for the comment. I think all of what you said is reasonable. I see now that I probably should’ve been more precise in defining my assumptions, as I would put much of what you said under “…done significant sandbox testing before you let it loose.”
Ustice
11

This looks more like a spotlight grab than a serious legal challenge. What a waste of time and money for everyone.

Ustice
20

My personal philosophy is a blended approach. In general, I’m a deontologist and Stoic, so not really used to thinking in maximizing much more than kindness. I like the heuristic of “what would Mr. Rogers do?”

The only thing that I have a hope of changing in this world is myself. For all the rest, I can only give my perspective. I’m much more interested in working with people in their current worldview than getting them to change it. I’m sure that whatever arguments I could come up with wouldn’t really be novel nor particularly persuasive.

Life is more peaceful this way.

Ustice
10

These ideas and techniques don’t sound particularly original, from what I have experienced with CBT. Maybe I am missing something important, but this just sounds too good to be true. I find it more likely that the patients that didn’t return because the magic bullet turned out to just be a chunk of lead, and they didn’t want to throw good money after bad.

Aliefs can’t be changed by just believing harder. They take time and practice to be ease and change. Those changes can be scary too. I expect that most people would need support as they go through that pro... (read more)

2ChristianKl
Nothing that David Burns advocates is about just trying to believe harder. His basic thesis is that someone who has a lot of deliberate practice can facilitate techniques in a way that's a lot more effective. 
Load More