An interesting thing to do with this kind of approach is apply it to humans (or partially human systems) and see if it makes sense and it makes a sensible society. Try and universalise the concept, because humans out partial human systems can pose great threats, e.g potentially memetic like Marxism . If it doesn't make sense of leads to problems like who controls the controllers (itself a potentially destabilising idea if applied on the large scale) then it might need to be rethought.

My take on alignment, aligned differently and willing to compromise

Some ideas about AI alignment and governance I've been having

True, I was thinking there would be gates to participation in the network that would indicate the skill or knowledge level of the participants without indicating other things about their existence.  So if you put gates/puzzles in their  way s to participation uch that only people that could generate reward you if they so choose to cooperate could pass it, that would dangle possible reward in front of you.

Has anyone been thinking about how to build trust and communicate in a dark forest scenario by making plausibly deniable broadcasts and plausibly deniable reflections of those broadcasts. So you don't actually know who ior how many people you might be talking to

Sorry formatting got stripped and I didn't notice

Would the ASI need to interfere with humanity to prevent multiple singularities happening that night break the topological separation?

Where is the discussion around the social pressures around advanced AI happening? And making plans to defuse them?