In keeping with ring theory as the attempt to isolate each individual property of and work out how the properties interplay with each other, we define the notion of integral domain to capture the fact that if then or . That is, an integral domain is one which has no "zero divisors": cannot be nontrivially expressed as a product. (For uninteresting reasons, we also exclude the ring with one element, in which , from being an integral domain.)
Suppose , but . We wish to show that .
Since we are working in a field, has an inverse ; multiply both sides by to obtain . Simplifying, we obtain .
The reason we care about integral domains is because they are precisely the rings in which we may cancel products: if and then .
Indeed, if then so , and hence (in an integral domain) or .
Moreover, if we are not in an integral domain, say but . Then , but , so we can't cancel the from both sides.
If a ring is both finite and an integral domain, then it is a field. The proof is an exercise.
Given , we wish to find a multiplicative inverse.
Since there are only finitely many elements of the ring, consider . This set is a subset of , because the multiplication of is closed. Moreover, every element is distinct, because if then we can cancel the (because we are in an integral domain), so .
Since there are -many elements of the subset (where refers to the cardinality), and since is finite, must in fact be itself.
Therefore in particular , so for some .