That peptic ulcers are most commonly caused by bacteria triggers an absolute denial macro in some people, I've noticed. I was fascinated when I learned that helicobacter pylor was found to be the primary cause of stomach ulcers, but it really seems to put some people off. I've had a conversation like this more than once:
"I'm so stressed at work I'm going to get an ulcer."
"Did you know that most stomach ulcers are actually caused by bacterial infection?"
"Stress causes ulcers."
"No, really; not too long ago a certain bacteria was shown to cause the majority of peptic ulcers."
"Well stress makes you more susceptible to the infection then."
"That could be, but I don't know how much evidence there is for that..."
"My grandfather had ulcers; they were caused by stress."
"I'm just saying the majority of stomach ulcers aren't..."
"But some are caused by stress."
"I think they're correlated, but maybe the people who have ulcers are more under more stress because their stomach is bleeding?"
"I don't think that's very likely."
sigh...
Huh. So apparently some people actually still believe that -- I had always taken “so stressed I'm going to get an ulcer” to be just a figure of speech.
(From the "humans are crazy" and "truth is stranger than fiction" departments...)
Want to be happy? Try eating dirt... or at least dirty plants.
Seriously.
From an article in Discover magazine, "Is Dirt The New Prozac?":
Given the way the industry works, we'll probably either see drugs, or somebody will patent the bacteria. But that's sort of secondary. The real point is that to the extent our current environment doesn't match our ancestral one, there are likely to be "bugs", no pun intended.
(The original study: “Identification of an Immune-Responsive Mesolimbocortical Serotonergic System: Potential Role in Regulation of Emotional Behavior,” by Christopher Lowry et al., published online on March 28 in Neuroscience.)