lavalamp comments on The Lifespan Dilemma - Less Wrong

39 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 10 September 2009 06:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (214)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: lavalamp 10 September 2009 07:20:18PM 4 points [-]

If you pay me just one penny, I'll replace your 80% chance of living for 10^(10^10) years, with a 79.99992% chance of living 10^(10^(10^10)) years.

I've read too many articles here, I saw where you were going before I finished this sentence...

I still don't buy the 3^^^3 dust specks dilemma; I think it's because a dust speck in the eye doesn't actually register on the "bad" scale for me. Why not switch it out for 3^^^3 people getting hangnails?

Comment author: gaffa 10 September 2009 08:22:35PM *  6 points [-]

The point is to imagine the event that is the least bad, but still bad. If dust specks doesn't do it for you, imagine something else. What event you choose is not supposed to be the crucial part of the dilemma.

Comment author: wedrifid 11 September 2009 11:48:32AM 1 point [-]

I've read too many articles here, I saw where you were going before I finished this sentence...

You mean... you didn't get it from just reading the title?