Blueberry comments on Previous Post Revised - Less Wrong

12 Post author: komponisto 14 December 2009 06:56AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Blueberry 14 December 2009 09:59:43PM 0 points [-]

So the number three doesn't exist? Freedom? Relationships? Holes?

Comment author: Jack 14 December 2009 10:33:48PM *  1 point [-]

This doesn't strike me as a serious question but it also isn't funny enough to definitely be a joke. So I'm not sure what you're doing.

My answer are exists, depends on what you mean, exists and exists.

Edit- with low confidence because ontology isn't something I'm that interested in and I have not thought a lot about these questions. The Holes piece is a classic one.

Comment author: Blueberry 14 December 2009 10:59:45PM 0 points [-]

Yeah, I love the Holes piece. I thought you were originally denying anything non-physical existed, but on re-reading it seems like you're just denying dualism. Sorry if I misread.