Alicorn comments on New Year's Predictions Thread - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (426)
If you're hoping to bait someone into slaying you so you can satisfy your deathwish without getting stiffed on life insurance payouts to your loved ones, you're missing a few steps.
1) You haven't provided your address! Read up on trivial inconveniences.
2) Post someplace with a larger population of violent criminals, or at least gun owners. We're pretty harmless around here.
3) Choose a venue where people cannot vent their frustration with you via downvoting. That way, it may build up to an efficacious level!
If you're being a troll: save yourself some trouble and go away. Eliezer's been irritable lately and is apt to boot you.
If you're actually, sincerely trying to have a fun exchange about whether you might be immortal (quantum or otherwise):
1) The little numbers on your comments are, in fact, important and should interest you. They indicate how you're being received, on average. You may have corrupted public opinion of this account to the point where you can't salvage it, but it can still provide valuable information, and nothing's stopping you from trying again in a month or two when you've mulled things over. If this is the venue you've chosen to have your discussion on, surely you think we make suitable interlocutors - and hopefully, that will let you find informational value in numeric disapproval too.
2) When people quibble with you over what words mean, that requires your attention too! They're trying to find a way to communicate with you. They're not being mean. If they were being mean, they'd just interpret you in the stupidest way possible and then snicker at you, not try to share information about how words get used.
3) Pretty much nobody here will find themselves strangely compelled by protestations that a) your opponents have poor reading comprehension; b) it is unfair to expect you to do any background reading even when links are supplied; c) you are winning; d) we are engaged in groupthink; e) you are an unheard-of non-quantumly immortal creature (although I'd be pretty impressed by certain sorts of video evidence!). Saying it once might be too much to resist! I understand! But repeating yourself isn't going to do anything that saying it once didn't.
This should go in some kind of "Loud Passerby's Guide to Less Wrong" wiki page so that we would be able to post a link next time... The only way to stop repetition is to distill the argument in a reusable form.