Vladimir_Nesov comments on Normal Cryonics - Less Wrong

58 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 January 2010 07:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (930)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 20 January 2010 12:59:12AM *  1 point [-]

This still seems much better than dying, and perhaps children would be better able to adapt to any future shock, but cryonics at this point entails the risk of a discontinuous leap into an alien future.

There is no "but". If it's better, you should do it. If the "risk of a discontinuous leap into an alien future" is so serious, then you should admit that it's actually worse if the children survive, which I don't buy.

See also: Reversal test, Shut up and multiply.

Comment author: jasonmcdowell 20 January 2010 10:01:02PM 1 point [-]

The part that interests me is whether or not I have the right to make these decisions for my (future) child. I think I probably do, and in absence of knowing, I will assume I do.

However, control over the decision feels a little funny and I don't know exactly why. It has something to do with consent and something to do with my not caring to push my parents toward it.

Comment author: scotherns 21 January 2010 02:42:19PM 0 points [-]

As a parent you make a great many decisions for your children that effect their lives in ways great and small. This is not simply your right, but your duty. Cryonics is just one of the many choices you will have to make.

Not pushing your parents towards it is another issue, but have you even discussed the possibility of it with them? My parents were surprisingly positive of the idea when I discussed it with them, and are now actively researching it. Previously, they were not aware that it was even a serious option.