MichaelVassar comments on Normal Cryonics - Less Wrong

58 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 January 2010 07:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (930)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MichaelVassar 23 January 2010 05:49:05PM 2 points [-]

Sorry, but with today's industry and government sectors I don't buy it. Not for uploads, not for aging. This awareness already happened with MNT, but it didn't have the effect in question.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 23 January 2010 08:47:33PM *  3 points [-]

Successfully uploading a mouse brain - and possibly also the radical extension of the lifespan of a mouse - would seem to me like it'd get as much media attention as Dolly the Sheep did. Has there been some MNT demonstration that would've gotten an equivalent amount of publicity?

Though judging from the reaction to Dolly, the reaction might be an anti-uploading backlash just as well as a positive one.

Comment author: ciphergoth 24 January 2010 10:18:38AM 2 points [-]

MNT == molecular nanotechnology?

Comment author: Jordan 25 January 2010 09:45:00AM 0 points [-]

Ayup.

Comment author: Jordan 23 January 2010 10:29:41PM 1 point [-]

There's awareness of MNT, but feasibility of the more extreme possibilities hasn't been demonstrated adequately for heavy investment. The roadmap from mouse brain to human brain is also much, much clearer than the roadmap from here to full fledged MNT.