Jack comments on Normal Cryonics - Less Wrong

58 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 January 2010 07:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (930)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jack 26 January 2010 08:42:50PM 4 points [-]

I don't think this is right. This would seem to indicate that one could do the ethical thing by being a paragon of viciousness if people learned from your example.

How about, "Maximize your virtue."

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 26 January 2010 08:51:45PM 2 points [-]

So other people's virtue is worth nothing?

Comment author: Jack 26 January 2010 09:15:11PM *  4 points [-]

Strictly, no. Virtue ethics is self-regarding that way. But it isn't like virtue ethics says you shouldn't care about other people's virtue. It just isn't calculated at that level of the theory. Helping other people be virtuous is the compassionate and generous thing to do.

Comment author: thomblake 26 January 2010 09:31:35PM 0 points [-]

Agreed, at least on the common (recent American) ethical egoist reading of virtue ethics.

Comment author: RobinZ 26 January 2010 08:47:19PM 2 points [-]

I don't think this is right. This would seem to indicate that one could do the ethical thing by being a paragon of viciousness if people learned from your example.

Such a person is sometimes called a "Mad Bodhisattva".