ciphergoth comments on Normal Cryonics - Less Wrong

58 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 January 2010 07:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (930)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ciphergoth 05 February 2010 03:07:39PM 2 points [-]

Could you write this up in more detail somewhere? The claim is that the "patient care trust" doesn't need new customers to be financially viable, and should keep going even if the primary business fails. If this isn't true it would be worth drawing attention to.

Comment author: thomblake 05 February 2010 03:19:20PM 0 points [-]

Alcor is running at a loss

I do believe they would be capable of running within their means if they had to.

Comment author: Morendil 05 February 2010 04:14:49PM 0 points [-]

For some value of "running at a loss", i.e. where you interpret that as "would run at a loss if it weren't for donations and bequests".

Given the nature of their business, donations and bequests do not strike me as an anomalous source of revenue. I do plan on asking for more information on the nature of these revenues before signing up.

However, this is an issue quite separate from the viability of the patient care trust, which is set up to keep suspendees as they are even in the case of a failure of the "main business".