= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
wedrifid comments on Privileged Snuff - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (19)
We have done this one.
Some of the individual elements, certainly. If there was a post that put them all together to make the point I'm making, I missed it, do you have a link handy?
I think this post is fine, though I do agree it feels like we've done it already. The OP comes at it from a somewhat different angle though.
We might as well have a link from here to the other LHC posts. Please reply if I've missed some.
http://lesswrong.com/lw/se/should_we_ban_physics/ is probably the most directly overlapping
Also
http://lesswrong.com/lw/u6/horrible_lhc_inconsistency/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/1eh/hamster_in_tutu_shuts_down_large_hadron_collider/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/u5/how_many_lhc_failures_is_too_many/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/sg/when_not_to_use_probabilities/