= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
rwallace comments on Privileged Snuff - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (19)
Some of the individual elements, certainly. If there was a post that put them all together to make the point I'm making, I missed it, do you have a link handy?
I think this post is fine, though I do agree it feels like we've done it already. The OP comes at it from a somewhat different angle though.
We might as well have a link from here to the other LHC posts. Please reply if I've missed some.
http://lesswrong.com/lw/se/should_we_ban_physics/ is probably the most directly overlapping
Also
http://lesswrong.com/lw/u6/horrible_lhc_inconsistency/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/1eh/hamster_in_tutu_shuts_down_large_hadron_collider/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/u5/how_many_lhc_failures_is_too_many/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/sg/when_not_to_use_probabilities/