BenAlbahari comments on Debate tools: an experience report - Less Wrong

38 Post author: Morendil 05 February 2010 02:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (72)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: BenAlbahari 07 February 2010 06:01:37PM *  0 points [-]

Point taken. I removed the implication to question "p" per your suggestion and added implications from question q (q="Is cryonics worthwhile?") to the questions:

a) "Is information-theoretic death the most real interpretation of death?"
b) "Is cryonic restoration technically feasible in the future?"
c) "Is there life after death?"

where the implications are:

a -> possibly q
~b -> necessarily q
c -> necessarily ~q

( See the result here: http://www.takeonit.com/question/318.aspx )

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 07 February 2010 08:49:06PM 0 points [-]

Don't you mean ~b -> necessarily ~q?

Also, for c, you must specify, "Is there pleasant life after death?"

Comment author: BenAlbahari 07 February 2010 10:53:46PM 0 points [-]

Yes, it should have been ~b -> necessarily ~q.

LOL. The idea that someone might actually expect an unpleasant life after death reminds me of some sort of twisted comic plot: the protagonist who's confident that they're going to hell so tries to postpone eternal suffering with cryonics.

Seriously however, you're right. Here's another possible qualification: are we talking about a finite or infinite life after death? In light of these possibilities, I changed "c -> necessarily ~q" to "c -> possibly ~q". I can't change the wording of the question "Is there life after death" because that question in its simple general form is already used in many other contexts on TakeOnIt. At one point I'd considered allowing annotating an implication (e.g. to express qualifications, exceptions, etc.), but the complexity of the feature didn't seem worth it.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 07 February 2010 11:11:41PM 1 point [-]

the protagonist who's confident that they're going to hell so tries to postpone eternal suffering with cryonics.

I'm not sure, but I think I heard at least one story about someone who actually did this.

Comment author: BenAlbahari 07 February 2010 11:52:58PM 0 points [-]

Wasn't that Paris Hilton? ;)

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 February 2010 01:23:47AM 0 points [-]

false alarm, she's not signed up