= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Warrigal comments on Open Thread: February 2010, part 2 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (857)
It seems like in gene networks, every logic gate has to evolve separately, and those restriction enzymes you mention barely do anything but destroy foreign DNA. That's less self-modification potential than the human brain.
The inability to create new logic gates is what I meant by the systems having low memory. In this case low memory to store programs.
Restriction enzymes also have a role in the insertion of plasmids into genes.
An interesting question is: If I told you about computer model of evolution with things like plasmids, controlled mutation; would you expect it to be potentially dangerous?
I'm asking this to try to improve our thinking about what is and isn't dangerous. To try and improve upon the kneejerk "everything we don't understand is dangerous" opinion that you have seen.
Well, I'm not familiar enough with controlled mutation to be able to say anything useful about it.