mattnewport comments on Open Thread: February 2010, part 2 - Less Wrong

10 Post author: CronoDAS 16 February 2010 08:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (857)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: mattnewport 16 February 2010 06:47:59PM 8 points [-]

This site does tend to implicitly favour a subset of human values, specifically what might be described as 'enlightenment values'. I'm quite happy to come out and explicitly state that we should do things that favour my values, which are largely western/enlightenment values, over other conflicting human values.

Comment author: Clippy 16 February 2010 11:59:16PM 6 points [-]

And I think we should pursue values that aren't so apey.

Now what?

Comment author: mattnewport 17 February 2010 12:02:37AM 4 points [-]

You're outnumbered.

Comment author: hal9000 18 February 2010 08:08:41PM *  2 points [-]

Only by apes.

And not for long.

If we're voting on it, the only question is whether to use viral values or bacterial values.

Comment author: Alicorn 18 February 2010 08:18:04PM 7 points [-]

Too long has the bacteriophage menace oppressed its prokaryotic brethren! It's time for an algaeocracy!

Comment author: mattnewport 18 February 2010 08:10:38PM 3 points [-]

True, outnumbered was the wrong word. Outgunned might have been a better choice.

Comment author: DanielVarga 17 February 2010 09:49:39AM 1 point [-]

You're outnumbered.

So far...

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 17 February 2010 01:25:21AM 1 point [-]

I say again, if you're being serious, read Invisible Frameworks.

Comment author: timtyler 17 February 2010 03:35:19PM 0 points [-]

That seems to be critiquing a system involving promoting sub-goals to super-goals - which seems to be a bit different.