RobinZ comments on Open Thread: February 2010, part 2 - Less Wrong

10 Post author: CronoDAS 16 February 2010 08:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (857)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RobinZ 18 February 2010 08:28:54PM 1 point [-]

I don't understand your logic. Genetic modification to allow a person to survive freezing and thawing would be great ... but what has that to do with current cryonics patients?

It sounds rather like claiming that "flight will be achieved by genetically modifying persons to fly, so there will be little incentive to work on the much-more-difficult problem of flying an unmodified person". Or, to take a metaphor that suggests work already happening, "sight will be achieved by genetically modifying persons to see, so there will be little incentive to work on the much-more-difficult problem of sight-enabling an unmodified person".

Comment author: PhilGoetz 18 February 2010 11:32:45PM 1 point [-]

It sounds rather like claiming that "flight will be achieved by genetically modifying persons to fly, so there will be little incentive to work on the much-more-difficult problem of flying an unmodified person".

Yes. And that's what I would say, if we didn't have airplanes, and I thought that modifying people to fly would be easier than building airplanes, regardless of the performance desired. None of those things are true.

Comment author: RobinZ 18 February 2010 11:35:56PM 2 points [-]

You're right - bad metaphor. What about the vision one?