BenAlbahari comments on Woo! - Less Wrong

7 Post author: BenAlbahari 21 February 2010 08:19AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: BenAlbahari 23 February 2010 04:29:56AM 0 points [-]

On quotes:
Quotes are by their nature vulnerable to being taken out of context. Any author who quotes an expert, or attributes a viewpoint to an expert, makes some effort to do so accurately and fairly. If they overly misrepresent people, they risk damaging their reputation. The same holds true for TakeOnIt. I should note that TakeOnIt, unlike other quote websites, always provides a source to help guard against that.

On deconstructing arguments:
An issue can be broken down into several sub-issues, where each issue has its own dedicated question on TakeOnIt. That way, you can see not only a summary of the expert's opinion on a particular issue, but also their opinions on more specific issues that lead them to their main conclusion. For example, here's Roy Spencer, a climate skeptic's opinions:

http://www.takeonit.com/expert/238.aspx

You can see not only his opinion on whether AGW is true, but also his specific opinions that lead him to that (in this case, negative feedback loops).

On collating an expert's arguments:
I was toying with the idea of displaying links to the quotes to sub-issues directly below the quotes for high-level issues. When I think about it, I'm not sure why I haven't coded up that feature...

Comment author: JGWeissman 24 February 2010 02:00:11AM 0 points [-]

An issue can be broken down into several sub-issues, where each issue has its own dedicated question on TakeOnIt.

That seems like a reasonable way to analyze an expert's opinion.

I was toying with the idea of displaying links to the quotes to sub-issues directly below the quotes for high-level issues.

It would be good to have the list of sub issues, saying whether the expert agrees or disagrees (or mostly agrees/disagrees, etc) and link to their quote on that issue.

Comment author: BenAlbahari 24 February 2010 04:11:50AM 0 points [-]

I've implemented it. Check it out:

http://www.takeonit.com/question/5.aspx

Comment author: JGWeissman 24 February 2010 07:00:34AM 0 points [-]

Nice

Comment author: BenAlbahari 24 February 2010 02:31:53AM 0 points [-]

OK, I'll add this feature.