AdeleneDawner comments on Open Thread: March 2010, part 2 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: RobinZ 11 March 2010 05:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (334)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AdeleneDawner 13 March 2010 10:37:14AM 0 points [-]

As I see it, it's less about how much harm those specific things do, and more about how viable the alternatives are. I expect that all governments makes tax avoidance/evasion difficult, and I suspect that paying taxes to any government will support a military. The lifestyle changes involved in actually living sustainably (as opposed to being 'slightly better than the US average' or applying greenwash) seem pretty significant and possibly unattainable for most of us, as well. (I could be wrong on the latter in a general sense; I haven't looked into it, since I'm already relatively sure that it's beyond what I, personally, could manage.) Given that Warrigal was asking about the career move, though, I expect that he does have other viable options that could be pursued without completely turning his life upside down, and that's a significant difference between this decision and the other two.

Comment author: wnoise 13 March 2010 05:55:59PM 0 points [-]

and I suspect that paying taxes to any government will support a military.

Costa Rica's constitution forbids a military, and they seem to mean it, though one can quibble about whether their police count.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_Costa_Rica

Comment author: Rain 13 March 2010 01:46:35PM *  0 points [-]

As I see it, it's less about how much harm those specific things do, and more about how viable the alternatives are.

How viable, given that you want to live in relative comfort and ease. But if a true valuation is made, then perhaps that should not be taken as given, considering the costs.