= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
NancyLebovitz comments on MathOverflow as an example for LessWrong - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (64)
I tentatively suggest General Semantics or something like it as a good starting point. It's a bunch of variations on the map not being the territory-- certainly not the whole of rationality, but intuitively plausible and necessary for more advanced work.
Semantics does sound like a good starting place. Does anybody know if there are any good semantics sites for beginners?
Note "General Semantics" is not the same as semantics.
I don't know much about the former but the latter is probably too boring to serve this function.