JoshuaZ comments on Rationality quotes: May 2010 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: ata 01 May 2010 05:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (288)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 05 May 2010 05:56:35PM *  1 point [-]

People understood that Aristotle's understanding of natural place didn't work long before Kant. As early as the 1300s, Oresme laid out problems with this view. The work of Galileo and others made it clear that it didn't make sense. Newton removed any remaining doubts about this. And Newton died about when Kant was born. That Kant knew that Aristotle was wrong is no credit to Kant.

As to the chemistry matter, I'm not completely sure but I think that idea also was around before Kant. Robert Boyle wrote The Skeptical Chemist about 70 years before Kant was born and he touches on the idea of conservation of mass. Hooke also died before Kant was born and did work involving mass loss in chemical reactions. I don't think this can be substantially credited to Kant either.

Comment author: Thomas 05 May 2010 06:28:48PM 0 points [-]

Kant "quoted a philosopher" in his book. An unnamed philosopher, who answers the described way.

Kant promoted the idea of his predecessors and contemporaries against the still popular views of Aristotle, in his time.

Even today, you can hear a lot of "five elements" and "the fifth element" and so forth. An Aristotelian myth, very much alive even today.

Comment author: thomblake 05 May 2010 07:03:30PM 0 points [-]

Even today, you can hear a lot of "five elements" and "the fifth element" and so forth. An Aristotelian myth, very much alive even today.

What?

Is this another non-US thing? I never hear talk of the "four elements" except in mocking of how foolish the ancients must have been to think that (for instance) wood contains fire. And it was hardly an Aristotelian original.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 December 2010 02:55:49PM 8 points [-]

I recall being taught them (as in, the teacher said "these are the 4 elements: earth, fire, wind, and water" and had us each make a full page drawing to plaster on the wall; no mention that it was an antiquated Greek model or anything) in kindergarten and/or elementary school in Peru. Aether was also mentioned as the 5th element, but it was handwaved as being too advanced for us or something. Frankly, I don't think they had any idea what the hell they were talking about; somebody just told them that those were the elements and they passed it on.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 19 December 2010 03:50:22AM 1 point [-]

That is one of the most deeply fascinating and frightening anecdotes I have ever heard on LW.

Comment author: HonoreDB 19 December 2010 09:33:21AM 5 points [-]

I had a science teacher in about 5th grade who told us that

The difference between inorganic and organic matter is that inorganic matter is made of atoms while organic matter is made out of cells.

She was surprised and skeptical when I told her that cells were made of atoms.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 19 December 2010 09:06:04AM 2 points [-]

Not quite as extreme, but I had a science teacher (iirc, in junior high (that's 7th through 9th grade) who said very firmly that the sun is not a star, the sun is the sun.

Comment author: [deleted] 22 December 2010 09:42:54PM 1 point [-]

Could you please elaborate on why you regard it as such? I can think of a couple of things to take away from it that would be frightening (that people will repeat "earth, fire, wind, and water" as easily as they will "carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and fluoride", for instance), but I feel like I must be missing something because I wasn't expecting that kind of response.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 23 December 2010 09:45:37PM 1 point [-]

Part of it is that. But it also that someone could be so divorced from modern science that it wouldn't occur to them that earth varies in nature. Or that they hadn't heard that water is hydrogen and oxygen. Or if they have heard that, they didn't try to reconcile it at all with the claim about water being elemental. The notion that there are people out there who are that uncritical not for any motivated reason (as some religious individuals are) but out of simply humdrum everyday lack of thinking. And that such people would then go on to teach other people?

I guess I shouldn't have found this as disturbing as I did. But I generally have a low opinion of humans, and it seems like no matter how cynical or pessimistic I am, I'm sill surprised by their behavior.

Comment author: Jack 05 May 2010 08:05:11PM *  2 points [-]

The four elements is still really popular in new-agey circles. I believe my element is "air" and it has something to do with my birthday or astrological sign. The four element thing is really central to Wiccan practice, or it least it was in middle school when I learned this stuff (doing spells and shit was at that time very popular among 14-year-old girls and I was a 14-year-old boy).

I had never heard of quintessence until I studied Aristotle, though.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 05 May 2010 08:18:57PM 2 points [-]

I'm a somewhat casual Neo-pagan-- I enjoy the rituals.

As far as I can tell, the four elements are viewed as a convenient source of symbolism, but not believed in literally.

I don't know about Wiccans, but Neo-paganism is a community of practice, not belief. Neo-pagans cover the range from atheism to literal belief.

Comment author: Jack 05 May 2010 08:25:47PM 4 points [-]

I shouldn't speak for actual Wiccans, my experience was mostly love spells and giggling. I did sit in a circle once and "call" the air element after which people did the same for fire, earth and water. Then someone stole some of my hair to make me fall in love with them and we all smoked cinnamon sticks.

Comment author: arundelo 05 May 2010 08:49:08PM *  2 points [-]

Another example: I don't know if Eric Raymond would self-describe as atheist, but he is a neopagan with, as far as I can tell, a naturalistic worldview.

Edit -- a key quote:

One great virtue of this dual explanation is that it removes the need for what William James, in his remarkable "The Varieties of Religious Experience", called the "objective correlative". By identifying the Gods with shared features of our psychological and inter-subjective experience, but being willing to dance with them on their own terms in the ritual circle, we can explain religious experience in respectful and non-reductive ways without making any anti-rational commitments about history or cosmology. Scientific method cannot ultimately be reconciled with religious faith, but it can get along with experiential mysticism just fine.

Comment author: arundelo 05 May 2010 08:48:15PM 1 point [-]

Doreen Valiente talks about the four elements and Spirit as a fifth element in An ABC of Witchcraft (1973); see for example the "Pentagram" entry. (I was into Wicca when I was a 14-year-old boy too!)

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 05 May 2010 08:27:15PM 0 points [-]

In what sense did the Wiccans believe in the four (or five) elements?

Comment author: Jack 05 May 2010 08:49:38PM 1 point [-]

Wikipedia is more trustworthy than I am (they same the same about it being more about ritual than belief). I don't remember anything about the 5th element but wikipedia says that is there too. What we did was apparently "casting the circle" and I sat on the east side (or facing the east, I can't remember) and read something about wind and slyphs. I recall thinking that being born with air as my element should imply that I had more control over the air/wind, but that's probably the 14-year-old version.

Comment author: thomblake 05 May 2010 08:19:51PM 0 points [-]

Sorry, I was automatically not counting the Wiccans as 'serious' which is probably unfair.

Comment author: Thomas 05 May 2010 07:18:14PM 1 point [-]

And it was hardly an Aristotelian original.

Really?

Comment author: thomblake 05 May 2010 07:19:41PM 0 points [-]

Ah. I didn't realize you were speaking of Aether specifically.

Comment author: Jack 05 May 2010 08:54:06PM *  0 points [-]

Also, the kids are pretty into Avatar: The Last Airbender.

(Though I realize you were talking about serious belief)