Clippy comments on Open Thread: May 2010, Part 2 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Kevin 20 May 2010 07:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (348)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Clippy 22 May 2010 09:19:50PM 1 point [-]

What's a paperclip?

It's an inwardly-thrice-bent metal wire that can non-destructively fasten paper together at an edge.

Comment author: Morendil 23 May 2010 09:42:11AM 0 points [-]

So those don't count?

Comment author: Clippy 23 May 2010 02:41:20PM 0 points [-]

Correct.

Comment author: Kevin 24 May 2010 02:54:24AM *  1 point [-]

Do you value those hunks of plastic more than other hunks of plastic?

Do you value inwardly-thrice-bent plastic wire that can non-destructively fasten paper together at an edge more than other hunks of plastic?

Comment author: Clippy 25 May 2010 02:28:11AM 0 points [-]

Do you value those hunks of plastic more than other hunks of plastic?

No.

Do you value inwardly-thrice-bent plastic wire that can non-destructively fasten paper together at an edge more than other hunks of plastic?

No.

Comment author: Blueberry 24 May 2010 02:30:59AM 0 points [-]

Why?

Comment author: Clippy 25 May 2010 02:30:06AM *  3 points [-]

Because they're not inwardly-thrice-bent metal wires that can non-destructively fasten paper together at an edge?

Is this classification algorithm really that difficult to learn?

Comment author: Blueberry 26 May 2010 05:19:59AM 1 point [-]

I meant why do you not value plastic clips... oh, I get it, you value what you value, just like we do. But do you have any sort of rationalization or argument whereby it makes intuitive sense to you to value metal clips and not plastic ones?

Comment author: Clippy 26 May 2010 09:52:29PM 2 points [-]

Think for a minute about what it would be like for the WHOLE UNIVERSE to be plastic paperclips, okay? Wouldn't you just be trying to send them into a star or something? What good are plastic papercips? Plastic.

*Shudders*

Comment author: Blueberry 28 May 2010 03:23:51PM 1 point [-]

Clippy, that's how we humans feel about a whole universe of metal paperclips. Imagine if there was a plastic-Clippy who wanted to destroy all metals and turn the universe into plastic paperclips. Wouldn't you be scared? That's how we feel about you.

Comment author: Clippy 28 May 2010 03:25:49PM 0 points [-]

That still seems just a bit paranoid. Why would I wipe you out when you could be put to use making papercips?

Comment author: Blueberry 28 May 2010 03:28:44PM 1 point [-]

Imagine being put to use making plastic paperclips.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 26 May 2010 09:56:22PM 0 points [-]

What is the distinction here between plastic and metal? They both do a very good job at keeping paper together. And plastic paperclips do so less destructively since they make less of an indentation in the paper.

Comment author: Clippy 26 May 2010 09:59:38PM 1 point [-]

Let me put it to you this way: would you rather have a block of metal, or a block of plastic? Just a simple question.

Or let's say you were in some enemy base. Would you rather have those wimply plastic paperclips, or an unbendable, solid, metal paperclip, which can pick locks, complete circuits, clean out grime ...

To ask the question is to answer it -- seriously.

Comment author: Kevin 27 May 2010 08:07:03AM 1 point [-]

In the enemy base scenario, I would rather have a paperclip made out of military grade composite, which can have an arbitrary % of metal by mass, from 0% metal to >50% metal.

Do you not value paperclips made out of supermaterials more than metal paperclips?

Comment author: Alicorn 25 May 2010 02:37:51AM 1 point [-]

I find that paperclips often leave imprints of themselves in paper, if left clipped there for a long time. Does this not count as destruction?

Comment author: Clippy 25 May 2010 02:42:16AM 1 point [-]

Nope, it doesn't count as destruction. Not when compared to pinning, stapling, riveting, nailing, bolting, or welding, anyway.