Nick_Tarleton comments on Abnormal Cryonics - Less Wrong

56 Post author: Will_Newsome 26 May 2010 07:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (365)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 28 May 2010 04:36:28AM *  0 points [-]

Also, I don't see what you can use the concepts you bring up for, like "probability that I will get enough utility to justify cryonics upon reflection".

This might not be the most useful concept, true, but the issue at hand is the meta-level one of people's possible overconfidence about it.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 28 May 2010 11:51:01AM *  2 points [-]

"Probability of signing up being good", especially obfuscated with "justified upon infinite reflection", being subtly similar to "probability of the decision to sign up being correct", is too much of a ruse to use without very careful elaboration. A decision can be absolutely, 99.999999% correct, while the probability of it being good remains at 1%, both known to the decider.