Houshalter comments on Open Thread: June 2010 - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Morendil 01 June 2010 06:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (651)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Houshalter 03 June 2010 03:38:18PM 1 point [-]

I was explaining why the downvotes should be taken back, as it appears they were.

I recently found out that you can't downvote someone past zero, so that must be why they stopped :)

I might just delete the post anyways. Ah well.

Comment author: orthonormal 03 June 2010 07:05:25PM *  4 points [-]

It's considered poor form to delete a post or comment on LW, since it makes it impossible to tell what the replies were talking about. (Also, it doesn't restore the karma.)

What's preferable, if one regrets a comment, is to edit it in a manner that keeps it clear what the original comment was, or to add a disclaimer. Here's one example— note that if cousin_it had just deleted the post, it would be more difficult to understand the comments on it.

Or a fake example:

Oh yeah, well your MOM coherently extrapolated my volition last night

should probably be edited to

Oh yeah, well (inappropriate joke, sorry)

if the content is to be removed.

Comment author: Blueberry 03 June 2010 07:12:49PM 0 points [-]

I enjoyed that example. I would hope it wouldn't get deleted.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 03 June 2010 05:26:21PM *  2 points [-]

It might be better to just spend some time reading the sequences. A lot of people here like myself disagree with the LW consensus views on a fair number of issues, but we have a careful enough understanding of what those consensus views are to know when to be explicit about what assumptions and what methods of reasoning we are using.