Vladimir_Nesov comments on Open Thread June 2010, Part 3 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Kevin 14 June 2010 06:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (606)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 14 June 2010 03:07:50PM *  3 points [-]

What does an average AI prof know that a physics graduate who can code doesn't know?

Machine learning, more math/probability theory/belief networks background?

Comment deleted 14 June 2010 03:15:02PM [-]
Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 14 June 2010 03:33:51PM *  2 points [-]

There is ton of knowledge about probabilistic processes defined by networks in various ways, numerical methods for inference in them, clustering, etc. All the fundamental stuff in this range has applications to physics, and some of it was known in physics before getting reinvented in machine learning, so in principle a really good physics grad could know that stuff, but it's more than standard curriculum requires. On the other hand, it's much more directly relevant to probabilistic methods in machine learning. Of course both should have good background in statistics and bayesian probability theory, but probabilistic analysis of nontrivial processes in particular adds unique intuitions that a physics grad won't necessarily possess.