PhilGoetz comments on Poll: What value extra copies? - Less Wrong

5 [deleted] 22 June 2010 12:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (136)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 24 June 2010 04:10:22AM *  1 point [-]

I don't think I would place more value on lock-step copies. I would love to have lots of copies of me, because then we could all do different things, and I'd not have to wonder whether I could have been a good composer, or writer, or what have you. And we'd probably form a commune and buy a mansion and have other fun economies of scale. I have observed that identical twins seem to get a lot of value out of having a twin.

As to the "value" of those copies, this depends on whether I'm speaking of "value" in the social sense, or the personal utility sense. They wouldn't increase my personal hedonistic utility very much, maybe double or triple it; but the increase of utility to the world would probably be more than linear in the number of copies. I would probably make decisions using the expected social utility. I'm not sure why. I think my personal utility function would make me suffer if I didn't.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 24 June 2010 04:28:21AM 2 points [-]

Speaking as a non-identical twin, one gets a lot of value even from being fraternal twins.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 27 June 2010 03:25:44AM 0 points [-]

Why? How's it different from being a sibling? Is it a difference caused largely by people treating the two of you differently?

Comment author: JoshuaZ 27 June 2010 10:06:02PM 1 point [-]

There's a much larger set of shared experiences than with a sibling even a few years away.