= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
RobinZ comments on Open Thread: July 2010 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (653)
What probability would you assign to a well respected, oft-televised, senior scientist and establishment figure arguing in favor of an incompatibilist theory of free will?
Definitions are not a simple matter - I would claim that libertarian free will* is at least as silly as the simulation hypothesis.
But I don't filter my conversation to ban silliness.
* I change my phrasing to emphasize that I can respect hard incompatibilism - the position that "free will" doesn't exist.