wedrifid comments on Open Thread: July 2010 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: komponisto 01 July 2010 09:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (653)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 July 2010 05:52:34AM 0 points [-]

I share your distrust of the regulatory ability of the US government, particularly the FDA. I further lament the ability of the FDA to damage the regulatory procedures worldwide with their incompetence (or more accurately their lost purpose). In the case of Kevin's specific reference to regulation I suspect even the FDA could manage it. While research on the effects of large doses of EPA and DHA (Omega3) may be scant, understanding of mercury content itself is fairly trivial. I'm taking it that Kevin is referring specifically to quality assurance regarding mercury levels which is at least plausible (given litigation risks for violations).

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 07 July 2010 07:23:58AM 2 points [-]

Stored riff here: I think the world would be a better place if people had cheap handy means of doing quantitative chemical tests. I'm not sure how feasible it is, though I think there's a little motion in that direction.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 July 2010 07:27:03AM 1 point [-]

I would love to have that available, either as a product or a readily accessible service.

Comment author: Nisan 07 July 2010 08:32:57AM 3 points [-]

It would make consuming illegal drugs a lot safer, no?

Comment author: Kevin 07 July 2010 05:50:54PM 3 points [-]
Comment author: wedrifid 07 July 2010 09:03:31AM *  0 points [-]

I hadn't thought of that, good point. Given that consideration, assume the grandparent comment was written in all caps, with the 'product' option surrounded with '**'.

Quality issues are an important consideration, for me at least, when trying to source substances that violate arbitrary restrictions.