ciphergoth comments on Open Thread: July 2010 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: komponisto 01 July 2010 09:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (653)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ciphergoth 09 July 2010 07:33:02AM 1 point [-]

Data point FWIW: my partners are far from convinced of the wisdom of cryonics, but they respect my choices. Much of the strongest opposition has come from my boyfriend, who keeps saying "why not just buy a lottery ticket? It's cheaper".

Comment author: gwern 09 July 2010 10:19:05AM 0 points [-]

Much of the strongest opposition has come from my boyfriend, who keeps saying "why not just buy a lottery ticket? It's cheaper".

Well, I hoped you showed him your expected utility calculations!

Comment author: ciphergoth 09 July 2010 11:23:28AM 1 point [-]

I'm afraid that isn't really a good fit for how he thinks about these things...

Comment author: Sniffnoy 09 July 2010 11:26:06AM 0 points [-]

It seems a bit odd to me that he would use the lottery comparison, in that case. Or no?

Comment author: Kingreaper 09 July 2010 11:36:21AM *  2 points [-]

They're both things with low probabilities of success, and extremely large pay-offs.

To someone with a certain view of the future, or a moderately low "maximum pay-off" threshold, the pay-off of cryonics could be the same as the pay-off for a lottery win.

At which point the lottery is a cheaper, but riskier, gamble. Again, if someone has a certain view of the future, or a "minimum probability" threshold (which both are under) then this difference in risk could be unnoticed in their thoughts.

At which point the two become identical, but one is more expensive.

It's quick-and-dirty thinking, but it's one easy way to end up with the connection, and doesn't involve any utility calculations (in fact, utility calculations would be an anathema to this sort of thinking)

Comment author: ciphergoth 09 July 2010 11:58:49AM 2 points [-]

One big barrier I hit in talking to some of those close to me about this is that I can't seem to explain the distinction between wanting the feeling of hope that I might live a very long time, and actually wanting to live a long time. Lots of people just say "if you want to believe in life after death, why not just go to church? It's cheaper".

Comment author: Nisan 09 July 2010 01:47:36PM 2 points [-]

Lots of people just say "if you want to believe in life after death, why not just go to church? It's cheaper".

I could see people saying that if they don't believe that cryonics has any chance at all of working. It might be hard to tell. If I told people "there's a good chance that cryonics will enable me to live for hundreds of years", I'm sure many would respond by nodding, the same way they'd nod if I told them that "there's a good chance that I'll go to Valhalla after I die". Sometimes respect looks like credulity, you know? Do you think that's what's happening here?

Comment author: ciphergoth 09 July 2010 01:56:17PM *  5 points [-]

Yes. I'm happy that people respect my choices, but when they "respect my beliefs" it strikes me as incredibly disrespectful.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 09 July 2010 01:42:41PM 2 points [-]

And if you reply "I only want to believe in things that are true?"

Comment author: ciphergoth 09 July 2010 01:55:07PM 2 points [-]

Apply the same transformation to my words that is causing me problems to that reply, and you get "I only want to believe in things that I believe are true".

Comment author: Sniffnoy 09 July 2010 12:26:08PM 0 points [-]

That's a bit scary.