Mass_Driver comments on Public Choice and the Altruist's Burden - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (80)
Look, I think Multifolaterose made one good point that you either missed or for some reason chose not to address:
Increasing the amount you donate to efficient charity by one order of magnitude can radically improve your self-esteem, productivity, and mental integrity in ways that you would not have expected based merely on your desire to do good.
In other words, if you calculate U(charity) = U(status) + U(doing good), you will seriously underestimate U(charity). You must also include a term for charity's surprising effect on your psyche; U(charity) = U(status) + U(doing good) + U(being good).
OK, but you shouldn't be quite so cavalier about it. If the actual equilibrium point involves 5x or 10x current donation levels, and rational thinking can help people move toward that equilibrium point, then there's this huge opportunity for us to help people help both themselves and others by explaining to them why charity is awesome-r than they thought. The way you phrase your disclaimer seems to suggest that the trade-off will inevitably break down differently for different people to the point where we shouldn't worry about it.
Can you say more about how to realize these benefits? I haven't noticed what I've given to have any real effect on my character or well-being...
Well, your mileage may vary. But here's Multifolaterose's report on self-esteem before:
and after:
To see why multifolaterose thinks it might happen to you, read the article, especially reason (C) for why happiness correlates only weakly with disposable income and the quotes from Singer's book.
Hope that helps.
Also, at the risk of being preachy or presumptuous, Multifolaterose doesn't predict that you'll get any significant character gains from throwing a few bucks around here and there -- you would have to give in an amount that begins to reflect your values. Spending 1% of your income on charity, e.g., suggests that you value yourself 100 times more than a stranger, which may not do much for your self-esteem.
But if you know that you're doing charity in order to increase your U(charity), then it's not charity, and it doesn't work.
I don't see why. You're still donating the money and you're still helping people. And doing it to increase your utility just shows you're the kind of person who feels better for donating money, which is a good thing.