PhilGoetz comments on Public Choice and the Altruist's Burden - Less Wrong

19 [deleted] 22 July 2010 09:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (80)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: multifoliaterose 23 July 2010 01:26:33AM 5 points [-]

Yes, this is a major reason that I doubt that donating to SIAI is a good idea. I feel that:

  1. In order for existential risk charities to do a good job, they need good researchers and donors.

  2. In order for existential risk charities to attract good researchers and donors, public interest in and concern for existential risk must grow substantially.

  3. In light of point 2, the most important task for an existential risk charity right now is to increase public interest in and concern for existential risk.

  4. SIAI seems poorly suited to generating interest in and concern for existential risk and may very well be lowering the prestige attached to investigating existential risk rather than raising the prestige attached to investigating existential risk.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 28 July 2010 03:22:50AM 1 point [-]

SIAI seems poorly suited to generating interest in and concern for existential risk and may very well be lowering the prestige attached to investigating existential risk rather than raising the prestige attached to investigating existential risk.

Why? How would you do it differently?