Blueberry comments on Open Thread, August 2010 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: NancyLebovitz 01 August 2010 01:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (676)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Blueberry 03 August 2010 06:35:30AM 0 points [-]

I would love to see a LessWrong Nomic game.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 August 2010 04:11:07AM 1 point [-]

I'm going to be starting a game soon, but I'd planned on doing it on another forum (which is home to a few LW lurkers - who knows, we may vote to move the thread!) I've been working out the initial rules over the past few weeks. Should I make mention of it here when it starts?

Comment author: Blueberry 04 August 2010 04:19:22AM 0 points [-]

Yes, please do, and PM me. I haven't played Nomic in a while, and would love to play with LW people. Is there some reason you don't want to start with either Suber's Initial Rules or "Rule 1: Players may modify these rules by majority vote"?

Comment author: RobinZ 04 August 2010 04:37:21AM 1 point [-]

One problem with Suber's Initial Rules is that they do not enforce timing - that my (sadly expired) Livejournal nomic lasted as long as it did I attribute in part to having explicit deadlines for turn-based play.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 August 2010 04:44:15AM 0 points [-]

Yes. This structure is modified to immediately abstract the notion of mutability, chunk rules by abstraction so that audiences of different levels all feel like they have a focal point, and most importantly, realize from the start the idea of guiding principles for sets of rules. It's an experiment, and one of the few initial primary principles is for players to make the game ever more fun to play.