timtyler comments on Open Thread, August 2010 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (676)
Machines designing machines will indeed be a massive change to the way phenotypes evolve. However it is already going on today - to some extent.
I expect machine intelligence won't surpass human intelligence rapidly - but rather gradually, one faculty at a time. Memory and much calculation have already gone.
The extent to which machines design and build other machines has been gradually increasing for decades - in a process known as "automation". That process may pick up speed, and perhaps by the time machines are doing more cognitive work than humans it might be going at a reasonable rate.
Automation takes over jobs gradually - partly because the skills needed for those jobs are not really human-level. Many cleaners and bank tellers were not using their brain to its full capacity in their work - and simple machines could do their jobs for them.
However, this bunches together the remaining human workers somewhat - likely increasing the rate at which their jobs will eventually go.
So: possibly relatively rapid and dramatic changes - but most of the ideas used to justify using the "singularity" term seem wrong. Here is some more orthodox terminology:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Revolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Revolution
I discussed this terminology in a recent video/essay:
http://alife.co.uk/essays/engineering_revolution/