JoshuaZ comments on Open Thread, August 2010-- part 2 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: NancyLebovitz 09 August 2010 11:18PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (369)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 17 August 2010 02:21:35AM 3 points [-]

I'm thinking of signing up for cryonics. However, one point that is strongly holding me back is that cryonics seems to require signing up for a DNR (Do not resuscitate). However, if there's a chance at resuscitation I'd like all attempts to be made and only have cryonics used when it is clear that the other attempts to keep me alive will fail. I'm not sure that this is easily specifiable with current legal settings and how cryonics is currently set up. I'd appreciate input on this matter.

Comment author: Alicorn 17 August 2010 02:25:26AM 3 points [-]

cryonics seems to require signing up for a DNR

What did you read that makes it seem this way? I haven't run into this before.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 17 August 2010 02:38:44AM 2 points [-]

A variety of places mention it. Alcor mentions it here. Cryonics.org discusses the need for some form of DNR although the details don't seem to be very clear there. Another one that discusses it is this article which makes the point that repeated attempts at resuscitation can lead to additional brain damage although at least from the material I've read I get the impression that as long as it doesn't delay cryopreservation by more than an hour or two that shouldn't be an issue.

Comment author: AngryParsley 17 August 2010 04:01:47AM *  3 points [-]

You don't have to sign a DNR or objection to autopsy to get cryonics. The autopsy objection is recommended, but not required. It looks like Alcor wants terminally ill people to sign a DNR, not typical healthy people.

I've signed a religious objection to autopsy (California doesn't seem to allow an atheistic objection to autopsy), but never has a DNR been mentioned to me by anyone at Alcor.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 August 2010 04:46:40AM 3 points [-]

California doesn't seem to allow an atheistic objection to autopsy

Which just a tad ironic. Atheists are people who consider the physical state of their brain to be all that is 'them'. Most religious people assume their immortal soul has traipsed off some place, a paradise or at the very least a brand spanking new (possibly animalian) body.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 17 August 2010 03:37:56PM 0 points [-]

Thanks. That helps clarify things.