= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
thomblake comments on Five-minute rationality techniques - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (231)
You claim to be good at explaining things. If you have time, you should take a crack at some more short explanations of things.
I agree. I'm taking suggestions for notoriously difficult rationalist concepts (including information-theoretic ones) that are regarded as difficult to explain, or as having a high inferential distance.
I'm working on some articles related to that, but I'd be more interested in what topics others think I should try explaining better than standard accounts.