sketerpot comments on Five-minute rationality techniques - Less Wrong

55 Post author: sketerpot 10 August 2010 02:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (231)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: sketerpot 13 August 2010 05:51:13AM 1 point [-]

A good resource would be the previous attempts at such a work, Aesop's Fables (Platitudinal), I Ching (Esoteric), and Judeo-Christi-Islamic Texts (Dogmatic). If we are to attempt a similar work for the ideas of reason then what can we learn from them to tell the aspects of how to provide a bible, or even a psalm, of reason?

Do you know that these would be good resources? You haven't established this; it might help if you gave one or two examples of how these works of fiction that you listed could help us out.

"The WIKIRESONIA" :)

You'd need to specifically have brevity and low inferential distance as goals, if you made such a wiki. The LW wiki tends to give a brief description of something and then link to some long posts on the subject; in contrast, Wikipedia tends to have really long articles. Getting all those "many interpretations" you recommend takes quite a bit of space. Check out how long the Wikipedia article on confirmation bias is, and ask yourself if a hypothetical Average Person could take anything useful from skimming it.

Comment author: adsenanim 19 August 2010 05:35:18AM *  0 points [-]

I present them (with my critique) because they represent to me attempts at reason as it was before the definition of reason was widely accepted.

I left out any direct quotes out because I thought it may confuse the topic of conversation and that the five minute rule would be violated if I tried to discuss them.

Aesop's Fables:

http://www.aesopfables.com/aesopsel.html

I Ching:

http://en.calameo.com/read/000039257e56b7faf538d

Judeo-Christi-Islamic:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabbalah

Maybe not the best resources, but they could be an introduction.

I will add one more, only because I find it fun:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramids_(novel)

For some reason the above link does not deliver correctly, but you should be able to follow....

Yes the wiki is a challenge, I was thinking of a new graphical interface...