timtyler comments on Existential Risk and Public Relations - Less Wrong

36 Post author: multifoliaterose 15 August 2010 07:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (613)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 17 August 2010 06:00:06AM *  0 points [-]

The common complaint here is that the signalled motive is usually wonderful and altruistic - in this case SAVING THE WORLD for everyone. Whereas the signalling motive is usually selfish (SHOWING YOU CARE, being a hero, selflessly warning others of the danger - etc).

So - if the signalling theory is accepted - people are less likely to believe there is altruism underlying the signal any more (because there isn't any). It will seem fake - the mere appearance of altruism.

The signalling theory is unlikely to appeal to those sending the signals. It wakes up their audience, and reduces the impact of the signal.