Sniffnoy comments on Existential Risk and Public Relations - Less Wrong

36 Post author: multifoliaterose 15 August 2010 07:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (613)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Sniffnoy 18 August 2010 12:04:10AM 3 points [-]

No. The sequences are not infallible, they have never been claimed as such, and intelligent disagreement is generally well received.

In particular, there seems to be a lot of disagreement about the metaethics sequence, and to a lesser extent about timeless physics.